| ▲ | kakugawa 17 hours ago |
| Here are a couple examples from r/ClaudeAI: Made entirely with Opus 5.5 + $3.21 of OpenRouter API usageClaude Code Workflow https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1wogab3/ Jaw literally dropped. I ran the prompt from the "Made entirely with Opus 5.5" post on my own project. Here's what Claude Code made on its own for about $4.Claude Code Workflow https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1wovwao/ |
|
| ▲ | ricardobeat 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| That is on an entirely different level! Good direction, a storyline… the OP’s are simple slides with poor copywriting, something models could do a year ago. |
| |
| ▲ | gpt5 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Also - notably - the prompt was incredibly under specified, yet the result was tasteful and well thought out. How far away are we from “build a startup that generates $1M MRR, my openrouter key is in my .env”? | | |
|
|
| ▲ | magnusokik 29 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This is mindblowing indeed, but I guess you have to iterate over it rather than just one-shotting it. OPs outputs seem more one-shot renders using remotion. |
|
| ▲ | alansaber 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Recent models have been a big step up on graphics generation. Not exactly sure why, it would be neat if they would release any quantity of technical blogs. |
| |
| ▲ | baq 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | RL fried on pelicans in various situations. | | |
| ▲ | TeMPOraL 38 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Particularly in adversarial ones such as picturing them operating equipment selected to be maximally incompatible with pelican anatomy. |
| |
| ▲ | ryeights 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Emergent capabilities, bitter lesson, increasing general intelligence, etc | | |
| ▲ | miki123211 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Over a year and a half after DeepSeek, it feels like we're slowly saturating what RLVR can do, and are back to RLHF instead. Fable was a huge leap in terms of model persistence and raw intelligence, but it still had terrible taste for human writing and code architecture. It would constantly keep making decisions which would achieve the desired objective (and make the code correct), but would bite you n years from now, and n years from now isn't RLVR checkable. Opus 5.5 has a very different "feel" than anything else I've seen in this generation, though GPT-6 does seem to be moving in a similar direction. They have finally solved the writing part, and architectural taste also seems to have improved significantly. I did a review of some GPT 6 Sol's code with Opus 5.5 yesterday, and it went "the code is correct, but there's a bunch of things here that could be simplified, and the split of responsibilities doesn't follow your established architectural layers" (which was true and exactly what I've noticed myself when reading the diff). I don't think I've ever seen a model do this before and actually be on-point. |
| |
| ▲ | pbk1 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | FWIW the examples in OP were generated by image models, not Claude - Claude just orchestrated the other models via OpenRouter |
|
|
| ▲ | e12e 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Did you get the raw js artifacts to continue working, or making "sequels" - or just the video file? Does the js stuff render real-time? Did you get script/dialog and voice settings (again, for making other films in same series/theme) - or just the rendered audio? |
|
| ▲ | j1elo 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Why these examples start from a request for a JavaScript animation? What is it that makes it "better" versus simply asking for an animated video? Is it the ability to later do some adjustments programmatically? |
| |
| ▲ | NiloCK an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | A given model may or may not have strong self-awareness with respect to how strong it is with different tools. If it's unusually skilled with one tool, but it's not the default tool for a job, then you have to put it in their hands before they reach for something else. The Opus 5.5 javascript-art + art direction definitely seems to be one of these surprise capabilities jumps. Maybe strong enough that providers will start to nudge in that direction in the system prompt, so that the user request doesn't need to specify it. | |
| ▲ | faangguyindia 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Otherwise, it will generate a sequence of many images generated using image models to make a video, which might cost more. |
|
|
| ▲ | aurareturn 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That's actually amazing. I think we can use it for our product. |
|
| ▲ | prathje 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Worth adding: the $3.21 were for nanobanana2 probably generating the assets. |
|
| ▲ | mannanj 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This is so different from the OP's site. This is so much better, trying it out now. |
|
| ▲ | hexapus 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| AI doing things that creative people do makes me sad. Stole everyone's art to regurgitate it on command to billionaires richer, and save businesses the expensive of hiring someone with actual talent to do it. I don't care how "good" the graphics become - it will always just be slop. This isn't the part of our lives we should be trying to replace with technology. |
| |
| ▲ | Gareth321 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | You see this as making animators obsolete. I see this as giving everyone the ability to make professional looking videos for their products, services, events, and websites. Automation has taken many jobs over the years, but it has also given us much cheaper and better products and services. I do not lament progress, but I think we should do a better job of distributing the benefits of this progress. | | |
| ▲ | bsenftner 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I worked as an animator for years, the work sucks, well, the specific act of animating life is fun, but that's like 20% at most of the job, the rest is politics and coming to terms with the massive out of control exploitation that is the animation industry. Tear it all down. | |
| ▲ | ben_w 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | "Professional looking" is a moving window, has been for a long time. Right now, looking like an AI did it (even if it was actually a human) is a sign of being un-professional. To a limited degree, one can prompt an AI better and get something that doesn't look as cliché as the default settings, but even then there's often someone who can spot a tell. "You can fool all of the people some of the time, some of the people all of the time, but not all of the people all of the time" applies here. Art is at least two different things, for at least two different groups: nice to look at etc. is one of them; the human equivalent of a peacock's tail (i.e. the effort is the point and cheating is worse than having nothing) is the other. | | |
| ▲ | bonoboTP 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Still enables people to do more. Just like Microsoft Word and and a printer / photocopier allowed small scale kinda-nicely-typset amateur magazines / news publications in schools or small local or hobby communities, but it didn't quite rise to the level of professional publishing and typesetting of actual prestige magazines and papers. But that didn't matter, because both relative prestige and practical value are real things. Making frozen pizza doesn't get close to eating pizza at an authentic Italian restaurant, but frozen pizza is still pretty good. So if someone says "introducing frozen pizzas will enable anyone to eat a good pizza at home, no need to go to a restaurant" then it's a half truth. The true restaurant experience will still have its role, but the frozen product is still pretty good compared to not having that option at all. But your friends will not be at awe at your culinary skills if you make frozen pizza. But they'll still likely eat it and appreciate it when hungry and chilling at your house. | |
| ▲ | Gareth321 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I think there will always be a market for human-made things, but this comes with a premium and not everyone can afford it. |
| |
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
| |
| ▲ | bcrosby95 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | People used to say someday you can sit around all day and create things. Now they say you can go into the trades and build someone's house or something. | |
| ▲ | koe123 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | In the end, the market decides. If a colleague sends me an LLM message I dont really want to read it. I also wouldnt watch an LLM video if I knew. So, for now, human intentionality seems to be worth a price to some so thats a reason to stay optimistic. | |
| ▲ | baq 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You’ll have your artisanal math proof and hand-made software certifications in due course, no worries. | |
| ▲ | avereveard 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | entertainment hasn't consumed art in a while most of it is mass produced at minimum cost and zero artistic freedom. some sparingly rare project that could be called art remains, driven by passion of the craft, and these aren't going away | |
| ▲ | bananaflag 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | How would you propose to build an intelligent being which would be incapable of doing this sort of thing? I mean, ever since AI was a research program, it was assumed it will some day achieve its goal -- in particular, make computers be creative. | | |
|
