Even if this was an honest rollout mistake, the design is indefensible. Reading a local file should never depend on a remote feature flag, and silently skipping it with no warning is worse. I've tried to give Claude Code the benefit of the doubt, but this crosses a line.

▲

tehlike 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Not everything is malicious. The author of the feature already responded on why this happened

▲

lukewarm707 7 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

it is indefensible.

▲

chrisweekly an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

I'm not the person you replied to, but your response misses their point: rollout issue aside, the approach is flawed by design. The feature author didn't address that at all.

	▲	tehlike an hour ago \| parent [-]
		The person had something else before they edited. They were overly negative, saying (from my memory) that it was inexcusable, and they had enough, pointing to malice. The response as it is now sounds fair. Before that it was not.