The person had something else before they edited. They were overly negative, saying (from my memory) that it was inexcusable, and they had enough, pointing to malice.

The response as it is now sounds fair. Before that it was not.

▲

a day ago | parent | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

chrisweekly a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Ah, thanks for clarifying. (And shame on the GP.)

▲

mgaldys4 13 hours ago | parent | next [-]

My only edit was to continue refuting at the beginning of the sentence that Claude Code's use of remote control to control agent.md is still incorrect. The rest is identical to the original, and my attitude before and after has not changed.

As for whatever "had enough" he mentioned, I'm not sure whether he said it on purpose or genuinely misremembered.

Since that's how he remembers it, so be it. I can't be bothered to explain anymore.

	▲	tehlike 11 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I must have misremembered. I wish you kept the original though. Because "Even if this was an honest rollout mistake" this is a new addition, changes meaning quite a bit. I disagree with what you wrote now partially (your comment on claude), but it does sound fair, and i wouldn't have written what i wrote.

▲

13 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]