Remix.run Logo
Muhammad523 2 hours ago

I think people simply ignore the banners and logos all around so its not that much of a problem

bdavbdav 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Not at all true. There’s a whole industry around measuring this (e.g. https://www.edo.com). A massive amount of money is spent on advertising for large companies. McD spend ballpark $3bn across the parent and franchisees, they want to make sure they get value.

totetsu 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You can ignore something actively but you are a still picking up on the message of it’s ubiquitousness. I think we have all had the experience of considering buying a {redacted} or something sometime after seeing and ignoring an add for one.

bayindirh 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The worst part is, the value they get (monies) is not the same value you get (worse health all over).

xnorswap 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

They clearly don't, otherwise it wouldn't generate so much advertising revenue.

DaiPlusPlus 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

On the contrary: it's because people ignore them so much that motivates those very same brands to constantly push harder, and more obnoxiously, each time major sporting events are on.

Like, what-on-earth was Visa thinking when their sponsorship of the Olympics had all the food-vendors and merch sellers boasting how they were "Proud" to decline payments from customers unless they're using Visa-networked cards[1] - which demonstrates they just can't exercise restraint.

[1]: https://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/Journal/Issues/2012/07... - Visa's official slogan really was “We are proud to accept only Visa.”

someguynamedq an hour ago | parent [-]

You think they advertise more because it's not profitable?

mrweasel 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The problem is that you have no idea if those ads are working, not really.

Do I go to McDonalds because I saw an ad, or because it 3 minutes away and the kid wants nuggets? Do I shop at my local supermarket because they buy every third ad on YouTube, or because it's the closest? There are a ton of details that influence our daily choices, and I'm not suggesting that ads aren't one of them, but I'm starting to doubt that it's the defining one. When I look at what I buy it's: availability, cost, and specification. There's not a hold lot advertising can do about any of those three.

If we could truly measure which ads works and which doesn't the entire ad based economy would crash over night.

devsda 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Ads don't have to be the primary deciding factor but it does make the rest of the process in the sales pipeline easy.

Whether we realize or not subconsciously our minds will associate the product and ad. When that association is reinforced by the salesman, a strategic placement on the shelf, or discount offers it is easier to convert it to sale.

someguynamedq 42 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

This is an entire industry. It's profitable. It works. The ad based economy exists because they do truly measure which ads work and know exactly how much money it makes them.

onion2k 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That assumes advertisers are correctly measuring the impact of their ads. They could just be wrong.

xnorswap 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yes, it could be a mass-delusion drive ad-spend, but I think you're vastly underestimating how much these logos actually go in to "brand recognition".

Next time you walk into your local electronics retailer and look at TVs, you might see a Samsung, LG, HiSense.

Chances are, if not for massive amounts spent on advertising sports, you'd overlook some of these brands in favour of the ones you recognise.

It won't be a conscious, "I saw this during the north London derby so I'll buy it", but subconscious name recognition will have a huge impact on willingness to buy.

mitxela 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Right, you won't buy a GHTESKJVFII even if it happens to be the best product

amanaplanacanal an hour ago | parent [-]

Half the products on Amazon have names like that.

iamacyborg an hour ago | parent [-]

And you’re mostly only seeing them because they’re paying Amazon to be promoted in listings.

22 minutes ago | parent [-]
[deleted]
xeyownt 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If you invest millions, you make sure that being wrong is a very tiny probability.

NeutralCrane an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Absolutely not.

Early in my career I worked for a pharmaceutical giant as a statistician. One of the things we would work on was trying to determine how much the various advertising efforts the company did actually moved the needle. Every year was the same miserable experience. The company would spend millions and millions of dollars in various advertising channels. We would attempt to determine how effective it was, but the wayin which they advertised and the way we collected data made it very difficult to generate any kind of insight at all. We would make recommendations as to how to adjust execution moving forward to ensure we could reliably determine how much value we were getting out of these campaigns, all of which would be ignored. They would massage our findings to tell whatever story they needed and would do the same thing the next year.

The marketing division is its own organization, with their own incentives that don’t necessarily align with the broader company’s incentives. They also were heavily addicted to relying on external analytical consultants who could pump out all the slide decks and pie charts they wanted, which would inevitably show that the marketing was not only effective, but should be invested in more the following year.

someguynamedq 40 minutes ago | parent [-]

Pharmaceuticals is an extremely specific example here. Anyone can buy a Coke.

gwd 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That doesn't match the behavior I've observed from large corporations.

rf15 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

And as a provider of advertisement surfaces you have every incentive to oversell the reach of your surfaces.

LPisGood 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

VC firms batting at such a small rate.

DaiPlusPlus 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That's the ideal, yes.

But the problem with marketing and advertising is that it's impossible to know if a campaign will be a hit - a flop - or the butt of jokes from an entire generation (e.g. New Coke, Jaguar 2025; or it may very well just work despite all the industry naysayers like Apple's translucent plastic look from 1998 - I/we felt no-one would ever buy an overpriced and non-expandable PC that looked like a kid's toy, or a loo-seat laptop.

...of course, what actually happens is the strongest personalities in the C-suite eschew what their MBA course taught them about trusting the experts below them in the org chart; instead they champion their own personal pet ideas, no matter how much predictable damage they'll do to the company's share-price, because they couldn't possibly be wrong; he is the CTO, after-all; very smart!

someguynamedq 39 minutes ago | parent [-]

The irony is that these "flops" are still making these brands live rent free in your head.

smallmancontrov 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

"I am convinced that about one-half the money I spend for advertising is wasted, but I have never been able to decide which half."

chrismorgan 30 minutes ago | parent [-]

I would be astonished to find a business wasting only half of its advertising spend.

inexcf an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

And homeopathy works because people pay for it.

someguynamedq 38 minutes ago | parent [-]

Homeopathy works as a business because of marketing :)

inexcf 30 minutes ago | parent [-]

I doubt it is brand recognition and more an abstract kind of marketing you mean. Esoteric word of mouth.

EDEdDNEdDYFaN 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I am sure you are aware that on a subconscious level the ads have an impact on you, even if you think you are actively “ignoring” them

inexcf an hour ago | parent | next [-]

I specifically avoid products i see ads for, cause the product can't be that great if it needs obnoxious advertisements, so the effect is more than subconscious. Now, i don't see many ads cause i block all of them where i can and roadside advertisements are not allowed here in Germany, but even if i was, i am of the opinion that the effect of this subliminal manipulation is severely overstated by the people selling ad space. I think the idea that i would buy something just because a company writes their name everywhere is ridiculous and as far as i know studies show that the effect on buying decisions is basically not measurable. I think the entire value in advertisements is just more people in general knowing of a brand.

rjknight 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The gambling ads have a conscious effect for me: I think “what a terrible world this portrays, I’m glad I don’t gamble”. For me, being reminded of gambling is just a reminder of the fact that I don’t like gambling. The same is true of some other ads too, they mostly serve to remind me that I define my personality in opposition to these things.

However, I have to presume that the effect is different for at least some other people.

someguynamedq 37 minutes ago | parent [-]

The gambling ads aren't for you, they're to make the gambling addicts fall off the wagon

wateralien 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

People don't ignore anything. Everything is absorbed one way or another.

dude250711 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Meta/Snap should make AR-glasses that block out ads.

If only they were not glorified ad companies themselves...

slig an hour ago | parent [-]

Well, they can block their competitors ads...