| ▲ | geerlingguy an hour ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reading through the EEPROM repo issue[1] makes me a little more sympathetic to the "feature", but I still don't like it at all. It might help in the short term to stop dodgy resellers who mod the boards with cheap upgraded RAM to make a buck or two... But the Pi itself is always taking one step forward, one step back in terms of firmware. I've been tinkering with some Qualcomm boards from Radxa and things are slightly better there, though you don't have anywhere near the ecosystem you get with Pi (or onboarding niceties). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | bri3d an hour ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Really? I found that issue and all of the related ones really disingenuous from the Pi folks; they just stonewalled everyone with "contact your hardware seller" rather than explaining what was going on even at the glossed-over level they managed in the forum thread. I do feel for them; they're between a rock and a hard place with mis-labeled clone boards. But their implementation seems to be the most hostile and opaque possible way to achieve these goals (which I also understand from an anti-cloning standpoint, but especially anymore, it's going to get reversed anyway). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||