Oh god that plasticization of the faces is absolutely horrifying. Like a bad image gen AI from 2022. Or reptilians wearing cheap rubber masks.

Edit: what's with the downvotes?

kccqzy 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Some people’s faces just naturally look like that. Probably depends on the cosmetics applied.

▲

hopfenspergerj 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The face is the background is clearly an AI model adding detail where the raw image is out of focus. The people you're talking to on this site are just blind.

	▲	hopfenspergerj 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Look at one eye has lashes and the other doesn't! It's just a low-quality AI "denoise+sharpen" filter.

▲

dpark 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> what's with the downvotes?

Presumably because others disagree. I also do not see it here. Zooming in there are clear pores and skin texture. Is it somewhat smoothed? Yeah, it has that feel. Does it look like a cheap rubber mask? No. And that phrasing is frankly very insulting to the pictured subjects.

▲

orbital-decay 3 hours ago | parent [-]

What's insulting about overprocessed photos? You can clearly see that the arbitrary part of the face of the girl in front is literally blurred, which happens neither to the other parts of her face nor to the photo taken with 17 Pro where details are visible over the entire face.

It's smartphone cameras, squeezing blood from a stone is pretty hard.

	▲	dpark 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> What's insulting about overprocessed photos? This is a heavy walk-back from reptile wearing a rubber mask. It should not be hard to understand why that statement can be seen as insulting. > You can clearly see that the arbitrary part of the face of the girl in front is literally blurred Not really. It’s a bit smoothed but the smoothest parts of her face are also where the skin is stretched tightest from smiling. It is actually smoother in those areas. I don’t see a ton of difference in the foreground between the skin texture in the different photos. Background is different but as you said, that’s blood from a stone. The data just isn’t there.