> what's with the downvotes?

Presumably because others disagree. I also do not see it here. Zooming in there are clear pores and skin texture. Is it somewhat smoothed? Yeah, it has that feel. Does it look like a cheap rubber mask? No. And that phrasing is frankly very insulting to the pictured subjects.

▲

orbital-decay 3 hours ago | parent [-]

What's insulting about overprocessed photos? You can clearly see that the arbitrary part of the face of the girl in front is literally blurred, which happens neither to the other parts of her face nor to the photo taken with 17 Pro where details are visible over the entire face.

It's smartphone cameras, squeezing blood from a stone is pretty hard.

	▲	dpark 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> What's insulting about overprocessed photos? This is a heavy walk-back from reptile wearing a rubber mask. It should not be hard to understand why that statement can be seen as insulting. > You can clearly see that the arbitrary part of the face of the girl in front is literally blurred Not really. It’s a bit smoothed but the smoothest parts of her face are also where the skin is stretched tightest from smiling. It is actually smoother in those areas. I don’t see a ton of difference in the foreground between the skin texture in the different photos. Background is different but as you said, that’s blood from a stone. The data just isn’t there.