I’m not sure you can sue an industry for “colluding” on safety, even if you can file the suit. It must hinge on the assumption that any new features coming aren’t harmful at all, but it’s clear they are. It will be interesting to see what they do about it - it shouldn’t scare them at all though.

This has to be a joke right?

People who are paying $X today to receive service Y today are suing for the irreparable harm of thinking they may not be able to pay $A tomorrow to receive service B tomorrow?

Maybe I should sue McDonalds because I bought chicken nuggets today but I am concerned they are colluding with Burger King to not offer Coq au Vin next year.

Western style capitalism is theoreticaly supposed to promote competition.

In reality, what it ultimately promotes is collusion.

This happens for one very obvious reason --- money. It is more profitable to collude than to compete.

Collusion permeates the economy and everyone just accepts it --- including government.

For example, which is cheaper --- Coke or Pepsi? They effectively cost the same. Special offers, price increases, new product introductions, even flavors (Dr. Pepper and Mr. Pibb) are matched almost exactly or will be in very short order by the dominate suppliers.

Any real compeition is virtually non-existent between the 2 major producers of carbonated sugar water --- and this is just one example of which there are many more. Increasingly over time, any real competition mostly comes from external sources --- like China.

And so it is with AI.