> That's a very... bleak perspective on your brother's motives.

Well, it may have been an overstatement, but not by much. Look, I have anger issues, but I never get angry at things because they are never trying to hurt me, and nothing good can come of it. I could probably fix most remote control issues (e.g. bad battery contact), but not after it's been smashed.

I also tend to feel the same way about, e.g., a rabid dog or vermin. Get rid of them, but not in anger.

▲

andrewflnr 2 days ago | parent [-]

I'm not saying it's rational either way. But getting angry at things is, at least as far as I can tell, normal for most people, without any subconscious idea those things are people.

▲

zephen a day ago | parent [-]

> But getting angry at things is, at least as far as I can tell, normal for most people.

I can well believe that I am an outlier here. Maybe not everybody else believes that:

https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=zephen#49748843

> without any subconscious idea those things are people.

Right, but there is a subset of anthropomorphism that relates to sentient beings, which is what I was trying to get at. Being angry at something is one thing; wanting to immediately destroy it in anger is possibly another.

I will admit I don't know the exact feelings involved, because I generally don't have them. The closest I come is the anger I feel at the designers of IVR systems that are too stupid to answer your questions and too obstinate to connect you to a human. I admit to yelling at those, but honestly part of that is that I have read that some of them are designed to sense frustration in users and connect you faster to an agent in some cases. But I have no idea how true that is, or whether it's just like pressing the completely impotent "close door" button on an elevator.

	▲	andrewflnr 18 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> Being angry at something is one thing; wanting to immediately destroy it in anger is possibly another. This is a real distinction, yes. I just don't see what it has to do with anthropomorphism. Like maybe you're saying the second one is more often directed at people-like entities? I don't feel that at all.