I guess the EA and rationalist cult members are out in force since this got flagged. Not a good look guys, you're just confirming what everyone thinks.

▲

freehorse 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

It may have been flagged as the title being misleading, as it did not really present as many details around the sex part as the title suggested.

Jokes aside it would have probably flown a bit better by removing the sex from the title, as the issue and problem brought up is about it being a cult, and not about the sex part specifically.

▲

pigpop 2 days ago | parent [-]

The title is the one used by the author, how is that misleading?

	▲	freehorse 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		I meant about the title as used by the author, not the one who linked it here. But in any case I said it was a joke about not giving many sex related details in the article.

▲

jackb4040 a day ago | parent | prev [-]

I mean I saw it 10 hours later. I'm thrilled to see stuff like this getting multiple hundreds of upvotes on HN, one of the deepest dens of tech capitalist worship in the world. It performing here is a couple steps from it performing on LessWrong itself. I take that as a sign a breakthrough is nearing. It is probably linked to whether the AI lab IPOs are successful or not.

The really amazing thing is, if the Yudkowskians are this weak, how doomed is the rest of our society that can't put up any defense to them completely dominating the narrative about where our economy is heading?