It may have been flagged as the title being misleading, as it did not really present as many details around the sex part as the title suggested.

Jokes aside it would have probably flown a bit better by removing the sex from the title, as the issue and problem brought up is about it being a cult, and not about the sex part specifically.

▲

pigpop 2 days ago | parent [-]

The title is the one used by the author, how is that misleading?

	▲	freehorse 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		I meant about the title as used by the author, not the one who linked it here. But in any case I said it was a joke about not giving many sex related details in the article.