Remix.run Logo
tazjin 6 hours ago

I don't think that this produces correct results, as it seems to determine whether each individual number is Numberwang. However, whether a number is Numberwang can also depend on the previous numbers in the sequence or other factors.

So I think as it stands right now this model can only determine whether a number would be Numberwang as the first number of a sequence, but even for that I still wouldn't rely on this in the actual game show.

aesthesia 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I'm also not sure that we know a non-number can never be Numberwang.

aidenn0 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If you think about The Event you can figure it out. (Don't think about The Event).

ceocoder 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

A non-number could be either a Numberwang OR a Wanganumb - this does depend on whether Yorkshire is a pudding or not.

jmcqk6 4 hours ago | parent [-]

It's not well known, but in February of 1983, there was a finch in the Galapagos that was found to be numberwang. And of course there was the famous incident in the 1994 World Series where a homerun was overturned because it turned out it was a wangernumb hit into the stands, and not a standard baseball.

wrs 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Do we really know that? Or have we only seen the sequences from people searching for Numberwang? Has a number been both Numberwang (or Wangernumb) and not Numberwang (or Wangernumb)?

tazjin 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Yeah, we do - there's a famous episode where after rotating the board both contestants stubbornly kept picking 1, and after a couple of iterations one of them was Wangernumb.

wrs 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Oh, well, after rotating the board, sure, I get that.

debugnik 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I can confirm this is the first episode, which I just watched since I had no idea about Numberwang until a minute ago. So I guess a true Numberwang fan would know that.

gaigalas 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Obviously, it depends on whether board has rotated or not. It seems the model doesn't support board rotation yet, so the result is consistent with the limited set of features.