| ▲ | wrs 6 hours ago |
| Do we really know that? Or have we only seen the sequences from people searching for Numberwang? Has a number been both Numberwang (or Wangernumb) and not Numberwang (or Wangernumb)? |
|
| ▲ | tazjin 5 hours ago | parent [-] |
| Yeah, we do - there's a famous episode where after rotating the board both contestants stubbornly kept picking 1, and after a couple of iterations one of them was Wangernumb. |
| |
| ▲ | wrs 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Oh, well, after rotating the board, sure, I get that. | |
| ▲ | debugnik 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I can confirm this is the first episode, which I just watched since I had no idea about Numberwang until a minute ago. So I guess a true Numberwang fan would know that. | | |
| ▲ | gaigalas 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Obviously, it depends on whether board has rotated or not. It seems the model doesn't support board rotation yet, so the result is consistent with the limited set of features. |
|
|