Remix.run Logo
spudlyo 6 hours ago

This seems like a lot of work for not a huge payoff. I get that the feel and experience of a physical book has a certain nostalgia, but for me, I'd just leave the big monster on the shelf and grab an epub from Anna's Archive. You have already ensured the author and publisher get paid, you might as well read on an e-reader, which is in my opinion superior in nearly every way to a physical book.

Ebooks sync across devices, allow for a customized presentation, quick dictionary lookups, bookmarks, etc. The only slight edge I'll give to a physical book is the ability to easily make marginal notes in pencil -- I realize that ebooks have this feature too, it's just not as immediate or as frictionless.

stronglikedan 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The problem with ebooks is that you cannot be 100% certain that you're reading the original text. That can only be preserved in physical copies. That's why the destructive book scanning for AI is such a tragedy. There's already plenty of examples of original texts being surreptitiously revised, and it happens with videos too.

WalterBright 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I was shocked to discover that "How To Win Friends and Influence People" by Dale Carnegie was heavily rewritten by his wife after his death. I had two copies of the book, and sure enough, one was the old version and the other the new. The new one did not withstand scrutiny.

vintagedave 2 hours ago | parent [-]

May I ask: what was different? This is the first time I’ve heard of this and I’ve only seen what was, likely, the new edition.

WalterBright an hour ago | parent [-]

My original copy was printed in 1977. His wife's version that I have was printed in 1981.

Parts V and VI were removed from the wife's version.

kulahan 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Well no, you can only be 100% certain you're reading the text found in that book. Books often change over releases. It's not some sacred tome containing an ever-updating reflection of the author's ideals. It's just the draft at the time the book was printed.

spudlyo 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That's not a problem with Ebooks writ large -- a zip file of a bunch of HTML documents aren't likely to randomly change on you. It's a problem of some evil vendor's "ebook ecosystem", where one day your copy of 1984 could vanish from your library. Most of the ebooks I've been reading lately are all public domain classics from Standard Ebooks.

duskwuff 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> The problem with ebooks is that you cannot be 100% certain that you're reading the original text.

That's equally true of print books. Misprints happen.

krupan 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Not the same thing. The kindle ebook you "purchased" could have different text each time you open it up. A movie you stream could be different every time.

ash_091 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Reading your comment I wonder if the parent comment is different each time, because "does the ebook text change reading-to-reading" is not the question being discussed.

NoahZuniga 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This post isn't aimed at people that read a physical book for "nostalgia". They read a lot of books and have already decided that they prefer physical books to an ereader.

shevy-java 5 hours ago | parent [-]

That makes no sense to me though. I always prefer physical books to any ereader, but I still stopped accumulating (new) books in my flat - they just accumulate space. I'll always love hardcopy books, but not needing them as a physical hardcopy is just better for me.

al_borland 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You seem to be optimizing for storage space, while others are optimizing for their preferred reading experience.

layer8 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I just get rid of most books after reading, knowing that I won’t reread the great majority of them or need them as a reference. For the few that I might unexpectedly end up wanting to reread, it’s okay if I’ll have to reprocure them. That case hasn’t occurred so far.

thece0 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I had the same problem which inevitable made me buy a bigger apartment. It's hand down the best investment I have ever done since tangible book assets give you so many different an non curated insights which you can only get from reading. You should not see books as something that take up space but rather something that free up space

lolakutty 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

>they just accumulate space..

Can't you dontate them to a library. Or take it from one in the first place..

lolakutty 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>which is in my opinion superior in nearly every way to a physical book.

A physical book, you encounter in physical space. Thus has a lot more chance to get read. The ebook, one has to take a device and press some button, before the book has even a chance of getting seen...

My ebooks typically get downloaded once, and sits forever unread in some device..

A physical book, I take from a lib and gets read automatically, unless it finds its way to the underside of some furniture...

That IMHO nullifies any convience that e-books have..

spudlyo 4 hours ago | parent [-]

We are talking about our opinions here, so there are no wrong answers. It's an interesting observation, the physical presence of a book is something I hadn't considered. Having said that, I'd wager lots of us avid readers have a daily habit, and we'd likely be working through our backlog during certain hours, even absent a convenient a physical reminder to do so.

milesvp 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I had to stop reading one of my favorite authors when I was doing infant duty with my oldest. The books kept getting thicker, and I could no longer one hand them comfortably reading either end of the novel due to the book's balance. I found a kindle mostly solved my problems, and I could keep reading again one handed.

That said, it never occurred to me to just cut up my book, so I could continue to read it comfortably. I think I might have chosen to do so though, since I find the tactile nature of reading a physical book to be more memorable than digital. Where the words sit on the page, and the act of turning the page, the smell, all does something to my neurons. For my junk novels, I don't really care, but for the authors I cherish, the closer to the printed word I can get the better the experience I have, and the more memorable the writing in general.

ympb121 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is what I do as well.

Buy the paperback for larping and performative reading. Get the epub from Anna's to actually read it.

6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
laweijfmvo 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

honestly, a manila envelope and some elmer’s glue is a lot easier than i expected going in.

ex-aws-dude 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Nah there's a lot of reasons to prefer physical

* You own it forever

* Nothing to charge

* Don't have yet another screen to stare at

* Its the definitive way to collect books (similar in the sense of vinyl for music)

* Going to used bookstores is awesome

* Seeing your whole collection physically is awesome and can be a conversation starter

* Graphic novels/comics are still better physical

ThrowawayR2 4 hours ago | parent [-]

> "Seeing your whole collection physically is awesome"

Not after what the submitter did.