| ▲ | Show HN: An e-ink frame that hears birds and draws them as 1800s illustrations(github.com) |
| 139 points by arnemunthekaas an hour ago | 36 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | jiwidi an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| Isnt this a fork* of https://x.com/WarnerTeddy/status/2060018688645115964? https://github.com/Twarner491/AvianVisitors https://theodore.net/projects/AvianVisitors/ Or maybe im missing to see is the same author? It went viral a few months ago |
| |
| ▲ | wccrawford 35 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | The new one appears to use real art from real humans, instead of AI art that was fixed. And just because 2 things do the same job doesn't make one a "copy" of the other. | | |
| ▲ | jiwidi 27 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | My mistake for calling it "copy", should have said fork maybe (?) They are awful close to still require a reference to the original project imo. They are achieving the same output (identify birds and display them in a frame display all hosted in a raspberry pi) with that twist to how to generate the art. | | | |
| ▲ | jdiff 23 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | What is "the new one"? The old one used AI, and this one seems to as well. | | |
| |
| ▲ | carb 37 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I agree I would expect a reference. Another difference between this an AvianVisitors is the image sources. AvianVisitors is all AI generated with a consistent prompt, but OP's is using chiefly public domain images with retouching by AI as needed. | | |
| ▲ | jiwidi 33 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Yeah agree I understand OP is continuing the work and improving it as he sees fit, but that in my mind is a fork and should aknowledge the initial work that sparked it. Maybe i'm wrong tho and this is completely parallel work! Waiting for OPs reply | | |
| |
| ▲ | DavCreator 28 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | https://xxcancel.com/WarnerTeddy/status/2060018688645115964 | |
| ▲ | tencentshill an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | This one seems to be more North European focused | | |
| ▲ | jiwidi 43 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Its awful close with no attribution or mention of the original project, which should be the minimum i feel like. | | |
| ▲ | arnemunthekaas 33 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Original author here. Fair point, this project was one of my inspirations, but I chose to take a different approach. This uses public domain natural history art and builds on top of BirdNET-Go which is a popular way of self-hosting bird-detections. (This is really a BirdNET-Go companion, as it cannot run without). I've seen other similar projects pop up like https://github.com/veteranbv/inky-bird-frame and https://github.com/adamoberley/HABirdDashboard/tree/HABirdDa..., each with their own spin. | | |
| ▲ | jiwidi 29 minutes ago | parent [-] | | That's fair, and I totally get wanting to give it your own spin. I still think it would be good to acknowledge the original project that sparked the idea, especially now that you've mentioned it was one of the inspirations. Definitely keep going with yours and evolve it further. That's how good projects grow. But for a healthy open source community, I think we should make a point of crediting the people whose work inspires us. Otherwise, over time, it can discourage people from sharing their projects publicly in the first place. |
| |
| ▲ | KaiserPro 34 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | true, but we are assuming that the author is aware of the other repo |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | nsbk 19 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Very cool, but IMO not mentioning https://theodore.net/projects/AvianVisitors/ as an inspiration is a very ugly move from the author |
| |
| ▲ | arnemunthekaas 16 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Duly noted, I'll reference this, as well as other similar projects in the readme. Thanks for the feedback | | |
| ▲ | nsbk 9 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Fair! Also, I would love to build this myself as I'm moving out of the city and to the countryside soon. I'm based off Spain, so I'll be happy to contribute if I find missing Iberian and Mediterranean species, or if some cool feature idea comes up :) |
|
|
|
| ▲ | firmretention an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This is such a cool idea and I want to build one. I wish I had this kind of creativity. I can do the hardware/software side, but great ideas elude me. |
| |
|
| ▲ | meteyor 10 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I love this! I have a forest garden with lots of birds. I so want to try this project asap! |
|
| ▲ | RGS1811 17 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This is one of the most wonderful uses of AI I've seen in a while. |
| |
| ▲ | telesilla 14 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I agree. It's such a pity Cats don't recognize images, would make for wonderful CatTV. |
|
|
| ▲ | misetech 20 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I would like to build something which can do the exact opposite. Sounds from illustrations. |
|
| ▲ | fnands 33 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Very cool! I wish E-ink displays were a bit more affordable. The 13 inch one is £229.50.
Does anyone know why they are still so expensive, at least at large sizes? |
| |
| ▲ | whiskers 6 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | This project will work with a 7.3" display just as well - they are £79.50! https://shop.pimoroni.com/products/inky-impression?variant=5... Disclaimer: I am the CEO of Pimoroni :-) | |
| ▲ | pjerem 27 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You have to distinguish the fake color e-ink that are used in mass consumer products which are actually black&white e-ink plus an LCD layer and are expensive, and the real color e-ink where each micro capsule embeds 3 to 5 different inks of different colors. The latest are pretty complex devices, very slow to refresh (hence why they are not used in your e-reader) and also very expensive. But the rendering is way much nicer because it’s real ink that is used to render the colors. | |
| ▲ | eckelhesten 29 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Patents and greed in a combination. |
|
|
| ▲ | practicalsystem 26 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| oh I need to build this for my mom she would love it! |
|
| ▲ | bronlund 30 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Artig! :) |
|
| ▲ | mungoman2 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Now this is why I come here! Amazing thing, will replicate. |
|
| ▲ | arnemunthekaas an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Author here. A mic listens to the sounds in my garden, BirdNET-Go (an open-source BirdNET classifier) detects birds by sound, and the e-ink frame draws a real 1800s natural-history illustration of each one as it hears them. Here’s a live web-demo from my garden in Bergen, Norway: https://fugleramme.arnegiacomo.dev A few things that might be interesting: - The screen only redraws when the set of birds changes, and dithers the collage down to six colours for the e-ink display. - Bigger birds sit toward the centre, scaled by real body mass. - 800+ cutouts across 400+ species, each cut from a real public domain plate. All art is historic and human-made. Coverage is currently best for the Nordics, Britain and Germany (but other parts of the world are in the works). - Runs fully local on a Raspberry Pi or your homelab (yes, even the classifier runs great on a RPI) The e-ink panel is optional and it can run web-only in a container against a BirdNET-Go you already have. Happy to answer any questions! |
| |
| ▲ | onionisafruit 13 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | If I were to make one of these as a Christmas present for somebody in Texas, and I wanted to contribute work toward good coverage for the area, how big of a time commitment would that be? It sounds like the kind of hobby work I could get into for a few months. | |
| ▲ | smeej 17 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Do you have your image source available somewhere? I'm not going to build this same thing, but I'd love to add some prints of birds to my shelves and, not knowing much about birds, it would help to have a set of pictures I could look through and go, "Ooh! This one!" and learn about them. It'd be a good jumping on point! | | |
|
