| ▲ | jiwidi an hour ago |
| Isnt this a fork* of https://x.com/WarnerTeddy/status/2060018688645115964? https://github.com/Twarner491/AvianVisitors https://theodore.net/projects/AvianVisitors/ Or maybe im missing to see is the same author? It went viral a few months ago |
|
| ▲ | wccrawford an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| The new one appears to use real art from real humans, instead of AI art that was fixed. And just because 2 things do the same job doesn't make one a "copy" of the other. |
| |
| ▲ | jiwidi an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | My mistake for calling it "copy", should have said fork maybe (?) They are awful close to still require a reference to the original project imo. They are achieving the same output (identify birds and display them in a frame display all hosted in a raspberry pi) with that twist to how to generate the art. | | | |
| ▲ | jdiff an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | What is "the new one"? The old one used AI, and this one seems to as well. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | carb an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I agree I would expect a reference. Another difference between this an AvianVisitors is the image sources. AvianVisitors is all AI generated with a consistent prompt, but OP's is using chiefly public domain images with retouching by AI as needed. |
| |
| ▲ | jiwidi an hour ago | parent [-] | | Yeah agree I understand OP is continuing the work and improving it as he sees fit, but that in my mind is a fork and should aknowledge the initial work that sparked it. Maybe i'm wrong tho and this is completely parallel work! Waiting for OPs reply | | |
|
|
| ▲ | bradly 26 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Fwiw an eink display is fairly common tech in the birdiverse. I also have a project that is the same thing. |
|
| ▲ | DavCreator an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| https://xxcancel.com/WarnerTeddy/status/2060018688645115964 |
|
| ▲ | tencentshill an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This one seems to be more North European focused |
| |
| ▲ | jiwidi an hour ago | parent [-] | | Its awful close with no attribution or mention of the original project, which should be the minimum i feel like. | | |
| ▲ | arnemunthekaas an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Original author here. Fair point, this project was one of my inspirations, but I chose to take a different approach. This uses public domain natural history art and builds on top of BirdNET-Go which is a popular way of self-hosting bird-detections. (This is really a BirdNET-Go companion, as it cannot run without). I've seen other similar projects pop up like https://github.com/veteranbv/inky-bird-frame and https://github.com/adamoberley/HABirdDashboard/tree/HABirdDa..., each with their own spin. | | |
| ▲ | jiwidi an hour ago | parent [-] | | That's fair, and I totally get wanting to give it your own spin. I still think it would be good to acknowledge the original project that sparked the idea, especially now that you've mentioned it was one of the inspirations. Definitely keep going with yours and evolve it further. That's how good projects grow. But for a healthy open source community, I think we should make a point of crediting the people whose work inspires us. Otherwise, over time, it can discourage people from sharing their projects publicly in the first place. | | |
| |
| ▲ | KaiserPro an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | true, but we are assuming that the author is aware of the other repo | | |
|
|
|
| ▲ | 27 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [deleted] |