| ▲ | aesthesia a day ago |
| One thing glossed over in this article is that Irregular was not involved in the OpenAI–Hugging Face incident; this seems like important context to share. |
|
| ▲ | hungryhobbit 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Do you mean "Irregular was not involved (we know for certain)" or "Irregular was not involved (as far as we know)"? |
| |
| ▲ | aesthesia 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | There's very little reason to believe Irregular was involved in that incident, and the article presents no evidence to that effect. So it's "There's not a teapot orbiting the sun somewhere between Earth and Mars (as far as we know)." | |
| ▲ | yorwba 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | OpenAI explicitly stated those were separate incidents: https://openai.com/index/third-party-cyber-evaluations-invol... | |
| ▲ | ameliaquining 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | We know for certain. The involvement of Irregular in the other cases was never a secret, they were quite open about what they were working on and the results of the evaluations were being published on their website. | | |
| ▲ | 0xy 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Their disclosures in other cases is not evidence of non-involvement in this case. | | |
| |
| ▲ | EA-3167 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | If you want to believe without evidence why bother to read articles? Faith doesn’t require that, but if you’re serious then a lack of evidence is important. |
|
|
| ▲ | embedding-shape a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That feels less like "glossed over" and more "Headline is 33% false". |
| |
| ▲ | aesthesia a day ago | parent [-] | | Oh, the headline is technically correct: there was an OpenAI incident that Irregular was involved with, disclosed shortly before the Hugging Face one. | | |
| ▲ | hluska 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | > One thing glossed over in this article is that Irregular was not involved in the OpenAI–Hugging Face incident; this seems like important context to share. Why are you contradicting yourself? Are you just really bad at writing or are you being argumentative for fun? | | |
| ▲ | nathan_young 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Stop being rude. There were multiple OAI hacking incidents. Irregular's evals were involved in some but not the HuggingFace hack. Hence Aesthesia is both accurate and precise. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | magicmicah85 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| That's cause Irregular was not involved in that event, they were involved in a separate event OpenAI published here: https://openai.com/index/third-party-cyber-evaluations-invol... In that article, OpenAI provides the context that this is a completely separate event from Hugging Face incident. |
