| ▲ | embedding-shape a day ago |
| That feels less like "glossed over" and more "Headline is 33% false". |
|
| ▲ | aesthesia a day ago | parent [-] |
| Oh, the headline is technically correct: there was an OpenAI incident that Irregular was involved with, disclosed shortly before the Hugging Face one. |
| |
| ▲ | hluska 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | > One thing glossed over in this article is that Irregular was not involved in the OpenAI–Hugging Face incident; this seems like important context to share. Why are you contradicting yourself? Are you just really bad at writing or are you being argumentative for fun? | | |
| ▲ | nathan_young 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Stop being rude. There were multiple OAI hacking incidents. Irregular's evals were involved in some but not the HuggingFace hack. Hence Aesthesia is both accurate and precise. |
|
|
