| ▲ | phforms 2 hours ago |
| I know it’s hard for some people (for understandable reasons), but at some point we have to ignore the X site completely and make politicians and public services/institutions aware that some people do not have or want access to the site. That is the only way anything might change someday. Maybe I’m just being naive here, but what else can you do? xcancel was amazing and I hope they can continue in some way. But since I have no actual need to go to the X site, I choose to completely ignore it, regardless of who posts what there. Most important things will be in the news anyway or you just pick it up from talking to other people. |
|
| ▲ | mahboi 9 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| It's gotten ridiculous. I get it if they have a login wall. I've had a Twitter account for years for occasional reasons. But suddenly it thinks I'm a bot and wants me to scan some QR code, download an app on my phone separately, and take photos of my hand. For whatever reason, that didn't work on my phone, maybe cause it's a Samsung phone they decided is too poor to generate ad money. Maybe they have legit reasons for all that, but it's not my problem. Just not gonna view things on there at this point. |
|
| ▲ | jdc0589 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| about once a year I try signing up for X after friends tell me I really should be on there for news in certain niches. multiple times now I've signed up with a fake name/handle/email/etc..., sometimes from a VPN, and within 10 minutes a friend usually tells me they see me as a recommendation to follow (they can tell, by the handle). Insta delete, every time. |
| |
| ▲ | nullocator a minute ago | parent | next [-] | | This isn't a criticism, but I do think this comment actually raises part of the problem. There are people on twitter telling people they should be on twitter, and it's apparently effective enough that at least some people are still signing up or trying to at least. The world needs more of the inverse, people telling those they care about who are on twitter to get off it. | |
| ▲ | immibis2 19 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | You should prefer to donate accounts to circumvention efforts rather than deleting them. |
|
|
| ▲ | sailfast an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This would be totally doable except for a couple of recent changes during the DOGE take-over where federal agencies mandated communication on X as their primary means. This is clearly illegal as all comms need to be posted in different accessible places as well as the federal register - but that never stopped anybody in this administration from a bit of grifting to drive users to their own platform. I’m bummed about this service being taken down. I will now just not be able to see updates from folks in the AI field that choose to post there and I’ll rely on aggregators instead. |
|
| ▲ | whalesalad an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > at some point we have to ignore the X site completely I've been doing that for years. Since just prior to Elon's purchase of it. Nothing of value in my life has been lost. |
| |
| ▲ | ruszki 6 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Not since then, but before it, I could read smart people's opinion there about random topics. Of course, when the takeover happened, almost all of them left already years prior. There is no such place since. Most of them went back to anonymous internet presence, if at all. |
|
|
| ▲ | asdff an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I don't understand who all these people are who keep saying 'but I need twitter for my local politicians.' Like really? I have not followed any local politicians or authorities twitter and I still get relevant information. Believe it or not, which you might not if all you do is parrot these comments and I have seen this very comment line of thinking parroted for YEARS about twitter, most people do not follow the city hall twitter if they even have a twitter, and they get by fine. I mean people are citing they need to follow their utility. Are you kidding me? Your utility will post a highly localized service outage that might only affect 1 block of a city or less to their world facing twitter feed? And not simply alert customers via their phone on file as they've done for me forever? |
| |
| ▲ | immibis2 18 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | The current American government is basically entirely comprised of people who were terminally online on Twitter and communicating with the right politicians - those people got everything they wanted. This seems like evidence that it actually does matter. | |
| ▲ | bpt3 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Your utility will post a highly localized service outage that might only affect 1 block of a city or less to their world facing twitter feed? And not simply alert customers via their phone on file as they've done for me forever? It doesn't match your very contrived example specifically, but yes essential services in my major metropolitan area provide more useful and timely information via twitter/X than other sources. People don't or can't register for updates from the city or county, so government organizations have no means of publishing information for public consumption other than social media, and twitter was the de facto standard. Also, many local schools, clubs, etc. used it as their "official" source for updates for years. You are definitely out of the loop if you can't access it, and places are glacially slow to change. | | |
| ▲ | aperrien an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Is it possible to help or encourage our local municipal services to have either an RSS or BlueSky feed? At this point, it's becoming apparent that putting all the information eggs in the twitter basket is/was a bad idea. This is a place where open source standards should shine. | | |
| ▲ | immibis2 17 minutes ago | parent [-] | | The most practical way would probably be to create that feed yourself based on their Twitter feed. You could automate it using some Nitter-like service (please do not scrape public Nitters, but you can run your own Nitter and scrape it as you like). It is generally easier to do something like this yourself than to convince someone else, who does not care at all, to do it. I don't know how you would advertise it. |
| |
| ▲ | iso1631 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | All my local groups are on facebook. It's horrendous. Could do with a browser plugin which only shows posts I want to see, it might even be good enough to send me back to facebook |
|
|
|
| ▲ | demo4567 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [flagged] |
| |
| ▲ | gfdd an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | [dead] | |
| ▲ | tommica an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Holy buzzword-salad, Batman! In any case X is a pretty decent place, as long as you mute the topics that get annoying. But the Algorithm is quite good at serving you what you engage with. | | |
| ▲ | bigyabai 42 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > as long as you mute the topics that get annoying People have been saying this since the Dorsey days, they were wrong back then and they're still wrong today. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | adamrezich an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [flagged] |
| |