| ▲ | beezlewax an hour ago |
| Claude's use of language is hideous at this point. It is verging on gibberish wrapped in important-sounding prose. |
|
| ▲ | JohnMakin 41 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| It's definitely worse and getting worse. I'm curious, do they not know this is happening, or not care? I struggle to believe people prefer the way it writes, which is becoming drastically different than its competitors. |
| |
| ▲ | paulhebert 4 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I wonder if they’re training heavily on Claude generated content or conversation transcripts | |
| ▲ | lukan 9 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Fable 5.1 was explicitely supposed to improve that, I used it only a bit so far and it seems at least better. | |
| ▲ | immibis2 7 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Maybe the humans are suffering from model collapse, and don't notice it. |
|
|
| ▲ | TomGarden 44 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Agreed. The language consistently triggers visceral negative reactions from me at this point. |
|
| ▲ | te_chris an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Yes, definitely load bearing. |
| |
| ▲ | trymas 41 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Today, I asked Opus what it’s gibberish actually means. It started with (topic about signing implementation): > This is your coat token, to my coat hanger in the opera. On one hand - maybe yes??! On the other who the hell speaks like that and it’s so specific… I’d expect Alice and Bob with locks or house keys. Is this infamous old book scanning (and destroying) affecting latest models? | | | |
| ▲ | nottorp 36 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | load-bearing! |
|
