| ▲ | feverzsj 2 hours ago | |||||||
LLM can't be trained that easily. More like actual human are checking your logs and stealing valuable things from you. | ||||||||
| ▲ | grey-area 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Or searching anonymised logs for mentions of this problem and using that as part of the context or training. This would work just as well and have plausible deniability. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | rzzzt 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
They wouldn't appear in weights but could be added to the context. My conversations regularly go "regarding your Java problem"... which was a separate item in the history from earlier. As long as I only see these (and nobody else sees mine), it can be helpful. | ||||||||
| ▲ | FeepingCreature 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
LLMs can learn from one sample. | ||||||||