| ▲ | foogazi 5 hours ago |
| > I don’t think ai models come close to nuclear weapons or to run-of-the-mill, everyday carbon emissions in terms of danger to humanity. Nuclear weapons don’t have AI but AI can have nuclear weapons |
|
| ▲ | riffraff 4 hours ago | parent [-] |
| Abstractly, yes but concretely, how? Many terrorist organizations would like to have a nuclear bomb, but don't. |
| |
| ▲ | asdff 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | "Department of War has announced a new partnership with blablalbablalba-AI..." World ends shortly thereafter. | |
| ▲ | petesergeant 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Abstractly, yes but concretely, how? AI has the capability to perform any function that can be performed over a network. You would hope that every system that can launch a nuke is properly and actually totally air-gapped, but there are lots of things you'd hope that turn out to not be true. | | |
| ▲ | Ekaros 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | They are not totally. As such I would give non zero chance of even current AI to be able to socially manipulate a launch after sufficient hype up period... So prolonged campaign might make it possible. | | |
| ▲ | petesergeant 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | And even if they are, agents are able to place calls with a fake voice to random phone numbers… |
|
|
|