| ▲ | supern0va 5 hours ago | |
It doesn't imply that. The singularity is just the inflection point. | ||
| ▲ | jsLavaGoat 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Singularity and inflection point are incompatible mathematically and in the plain sense, it really is focused on a particular moment and always has been, hence the term. And it's definitely supposed to imply some kind of historical discontinuity not a change in convexity. | ||
| ▲ | Fordec 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Which assumes the presence of an inflection point that keeps inflecting rather than revert to an S-curve. The growth model is not borne out yet to declare what shape it is. | ||