| ▲ | jiggawatts 5 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
An interesting challenge with dating sites is that the “bell curves” of attractiveness versus desired attractiveness between men and women aren’t symmetric. This leads to difficulties running a dating site because women will only say yes to 9/10 or better men, but men will message anyone with a pulse which in turn inflates female expectations. Many women only ever join dating sites as an ego boost, with no intention to actually go on dates. I had the idea that the way this could work is a totally automated match making system akin to Uber where you are penalised for not accepting matches made by the system. You don’t have to get married or anything, but if you don’t both turn up at the same GPS time space coordinates it counts against you. Similarly, the system should require an up front ~$50 fee from both sexes per date. You don’t get it back if you stand up a date. Etc… It would be very hard to bootstrap, but once going it would produce many more long term partnerships than “swipe right” style apps. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | SwellJoe 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
"I had the idea that the way this could work is a totally automated match making system akin to Uber where you are penalised for not accepting matches made by the system. You don’t have to get married or anything, but if you don’t both turn up at the same GPS time space coordinates it counts against you. Similarly, the system should require an up front ~$50 fee from both sexes per date. You don’t get it back if you stand up a date." No woman alive would agree to this. And, I'm sure there are women who sign up for dating apps for an ego boost and that's why they don't reply, but most are just overwhelmed by the shotgun approach some men take and end up not taking any of their responses seriously. Women often quit dating apps because of bad experiences, they're not going to agree to a date where they don't get to do their own vetting of the person they're meeting. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | nl 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> women will only say yes to 9/10 or better men, but men will message anyone with a pulse which in turn inflates female expectations Is this a SF thing? I'm maybe a 7/10 and I've never had trouble getting dates in any city I've lived in or traveled through. I just put some effort into sound interesting, make sure my pics are the best I can find and it's fine. But I've never tried dating in SF and I've heard the gender balance can make it harder? | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | November_Echo 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
That might sound good in theory, but no one is going to sign up for that. Who will want to pay $50 to not meet up with the creep some algorithm has set them up with? Honestly, it's kinda dangerous. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | hn993302 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Btw Tinder did seem to have a hotness score, at least when I was single in college. Higher score meant being shown higher up on others' stacks. You hurt your score by swiping right on people who don't swipe right back. It was possible to game because it didn't matter as much how many people swiped right on you total. There were ways to tell who liked you ahead of time, even before that became a paid feature. I got myself to the top. All the other guys in those slots were 6'4" gigachad athletes/lumberjacks. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Spooky23 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
For dudes, you just pay. They boost you and give you a bonus boost when you first start. The tinder strategy is simple. Sign up, make profile, swipe, stop, come back in a week. Then upgrade with in app purchase, hustle to get 2-3 contacts, and churn the subscription. Repeat if needed with a different app and rotate as needed. You’ll get a date with this method and the rest is up to you. Look around, hot girls are with toad looking guys all of the time. You need to manipulate the platform so you are front and center. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | applfanboysbgon 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
A man trying to design a dating system to force women into dates is hilarious. One problem you seem not to have considered: what's in it for the woman? Why would she ever agree to this? To say nothing of how you would be excoriated in the media the first time a woman was assaulted and reported that she had bad vibes but felt pressured into it by your app. And that's if you didn't just create the perfect serial killer pipeline. This is literally the worst PR nightmare of an idea I've heard in my entire life. And, just, you know, bad from an actual human perspective too. | |||||||||||||||||