| ▲ | drum55 4 hours ago |
| It’s not seconds though, it’s in the order of tens of milliseconds of work, it’s faster to complete the challenge than most http requests will take. last difficulty 5 nonce 645376 in 9 ms (101.6MH/s, avx512-x16) This takes many minutes to solve on a cellphone, 9 milliseconds on a cheap VPS. It’s not stopping anyone. |
|
| ▲ | bombela 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Yep, on my aging phone it takes quite w noticable amount of time to go through. But on my more recent laptop wnd workstations, it's a quick flash of a manga lolita. |
|
| ▲ | Jtariiiii 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| >It’s not stopping anyone. You could just spend 30 seconds googling instead of confidently asserting nonsense. There are plenty of people demonstrating that Anubis reduces bot traffic. |
| |
| ▲ | drum55 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | That’s because its weird and mostly irrelevant, it’s nothing to do with the proof of work being any sort of economic impediment. It takes Claude a few minutes to write a near instant solver, that’s the maximum proof of work cost this adds. | |
| ▲ | gruez 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | >There are plenty of people demonstrating that Anubis reduces bot traffic. "Anubis reduces bot traffic" and "[the proof of work] is not stopping anyone" isn't contradictory, especially if anubis isn't being benchmarked against non-POW alternatives like IP/ASN bans, or tls fingerprinting. | | |
| ▲ | Jtariiiii 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | "it's not stopping anyone" and "it is stopping some people" are mutually exclusive statements. | | |
| ▲ | gruez 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | You're selectively quoting the comment. It's clearly talking about the PoW aspect not being a serious impediment. |
|
|
|