I feel like this confrontational approach to the problem has achieved basically all it can achieve over the last 55 years.

We're heavy in the diminishing returns here - if it hasn't even inverted already.

New tools and approaches will have to be found to further push these goals.

▲

skeptical1884 2 hours ago | parent [-]

What kind of confrontational approach do you mean?

▲

hypfer 2 hours ago | parent [-]

The essay there weaponizes sarcasm + the emotional experience of that reality to hit the reader over the head with, in an attempt to break their script and force them to a change in perspective.

This - evidently - worked and works, but there are trade-offs to it.

Specifically, it is zero-sum, which eventually led to the gender war we have now. Since the defenses have been (for the most part) broken down, a modern pivot would likely move towards more unification again, I guess.

▲

disdegeneration 2 hours ago | parent [-]

The social mechanics to decouple woman permanently from reproduction are already in the making. Incubators and AI educators and people can have children with a company, the rest of the social problems (the social network harem effect) then go out the window. If you need to be a millionaire to have a conventional family, tradition is out, corporate cloning is in. The working alternative to religious fundamentalism.

▲

hypfer 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This comment was dead on arrival, but I've vouched for it, because I believe it's interesting.

I do not believe the conspiracy part, but I do also believe that this decoupling will happen eventually. It seems like the logical conclusion of the trajectory we're on. Leaving biological reality behind in the pursuit of individualism.

It might be a good thing, but we might also find that we were not ready for the total freedom from said biological reality. But that is to be said about a lot of things, SV is pushing towards.

But maybe we will also see stuff crashing down in the near-ish future, and then, pondering about the "end of biological reality" will seem like unreal hallucinations.

___

Hmm. The LLM I've been feeding this comment section pointed me at the Universe 25 Experiment. I've never heard of that before.

▲

wojciii an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

While I support equality between biological sexes this had some ill effects.

Giving birth is a woman job. Breastfeeding is a woman's job. Replacing breast milk with something else might be one of the causes of allergies and other ill effects (I'm guessing).

To me it looks like women want to be compensated for the unpaid work of birthing children and taking care of them during their upbringing. No one fucking likes unpaid work. It's not right.

For me this if the current feminism and I do support it.

▲

swagasaurus-rex 29 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Isn’t being a stay at home wife being compensated to do that work?

Your bills and mortgage are paid for, so is the food. You get to spend time with the kids. Sounds way less stressful than a high stakes job.

	▲	sersi a minute ago \| parent [-]
		You also have no way to get out of a bad relationship if things turn sour. Being stay at home is extremely risky, you give up freedom.

▲

exmadscientist 43 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> (I'm guessing)

Please don't do this. It's not helpful.

▲

christkv 32 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

The fact that everything in life is compared to monetary value is the problem. There abstraction of paternalism to the state is another. For the state you are a number for your family and friends you have a name