It is astonishing how easy it is to see the AI hand at work in the writing. Really, it is almost impossible not to see. I don’t get how these people feel it is appropriate to pass off slop like this and not even bother to edit it.

Just painful to read.

▲

rexpop 25 minutes ago | parent [-]

Shut up. Just shut up.

> Avoid generic tangents.

> Please don't post shallow dismissals

> Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—e.g. article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage.

See: Hacker News Guidelines

	▲	nxc18 9 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		> Please don't post shallow dismissals I’ll point out you also violate this guideline. Do you seriously read the article and not see that it is extremely low signal-to-noise? And full of non-sequiturs and strange unnecessary clarifications? And passed off as a research project. “Claude, write an article about why agents use grep instead of LSP” This would have saved everyone the pain of reading this. As another user pointed out: “Training support is a hypothesis consistent with these results, not something this study proves.” is not a sentence a human would write, nor is it a sentence that a human should ever be made to read. I apologize for reproducing it; the article is chock full of these “gems”.