Shut up. Just shut up.

> Avoid generic tangents.

> Please don't post shallow dismissals

> Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—e.g. article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage.

See: Hacker News Guidelines

▲

nxc18 41 minutes ago | parent [-]

> Please don't post shallow dismissals

I’ll point out you also violate this guideline.

Do you seriously read the article and not see that it is extremely low signal-to-noise? And full of non-sequiturs and strange unnecessary clarifications? And passed off as a research project.

“Claude, write an article about why agents use grep instead of LSP”

This would have saved everyone the pain of reading this.

As another user pointed out: “Training support is a hypothesis consistent with these results, not something this study proves.” is not a sentence a human would write, nor is it a sentence that a human should ever be made to read. I apologize for reproducing it; the article is chock full of these “gems”.

	▲	chvid 23 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		100%. This article is written by AI. The problem is it makes you doubt the whole thing: Did the person behind this do any work at all? Or is this just content marketing for an AI project - something that used to require time and effort - but now can be done by anyone with a click on a button. Too bad. Because this is sort of an interesting subject.