| ▲ | driverdan 6 hours ago |
| > If this is truly AGI (subject to one's definition of AGI still) Scoring well in a benchmark that's called AGI does not make an LLM AGI. |
|
| ▲ | Jaxkr 31 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| The goalposts of AGI will shift forever. If you showed our current capabilities to someone from 2016 it would be declared AGI. |
| |
|
| ▲ | luma 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| What test do you propose as the actual go/no-go gauge to verify if some model is or is not AGI? |
| |
| ▲ | SV_BubbleTime 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | If you’re talking some nonsense, silly singularity… than whatever, don’t care. But if you’re asking when a model has a sustainable general intelligence, for me, it’s pretty easy… When it makes financial sense to run it 24 hours a day. | | |
| ▲ | luma 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | For whom? That is a fantastically ill-defined test. Everyone here is comfortable throwing around this or that is or isn't AGI which is fun because, at the same time, nobody seems to have a testable definition. It makes either position pointless to argue. | |
| ▲ | deadmutex 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | What does it mean to run a model 24 hours a day? Aren't we way way past that already? QPS to any of the frontier models for a given point in time is most likely (far) greater than zero. | |
| ▲ | SequoiaHope an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | I mean the laundromat runs the machines pretty much 24 hours a day but a washing machine is not AGI. Directly - something can be useful without being AGI. |
| |
| ▲ | p-e-w 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | There can be no such test because “AGI” is (or has become) a pseudo-philosophical/socio-political concept rather than a scientific one. | | |
| ▲ | esikich 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | It always has been. The idea around here that we can actually define intelligence and point to it is sophomoric and incredibly frustrating. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | ShinyLeftPad an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| talking about self proclaimed, it's about as much AGI as openAI is open. |
|
| ▲ | tclancy an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If you’re trying to tell me this is why my mom telling me how handsome I am didn’t translate to the general populous, I could have used this info about forty years ago. |
|
| ▲ | jhonof 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| But they declared it... |
| |
| ▲ | maxall4 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | “I declare bankruptcy!” - Michael Scott | |
| ▲ | cyanydeez 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I DECLARE AGI! "Homer, you can't just declare Artifical General Intelligence; you need to like, make something or something...mmmmrrrhh" | | | |
| ▲ | wilg 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | did they? | | |
| ▲ | bsndjdjdjdj 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | """ In a closed a press briefing earlier today, OpenAI co-founder and president Greg Brockman offered an unusually direct formulation of that message, ending the session with: “Welcome to the AGI era.” """ |
|
|
|
| ▲ | dmitrygr 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Hey now! Keep your reason out of their marketin^H^H lies! |
