| ▲ | paxys 6 hours ago |
| No, because it has never meant a specific thing that everyone agreed on. |
|
| ▲ | sm-silversight 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Prime Intellect or nothing. |
|
| ▲ | drop_star 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Does it pass the Turing test? |
| |
| ▲ | bigfishrunning 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Depending on the proctor, ELIZA passes a Turing test. The Turing test is an interesting thought experiment, but isn't really a good measure. | |
| ▲ | bryan0 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | that would be a reasonable definition of AGI if everyone agree upon the specifics of the test, but that has never happened. Turing test is very much out of style, but I think that's because no one could even agree what the test was. I personally like the Kurzweil-Kapor version of the test and that is still unsettled: https://longbets.org/1/ | | |
| ▲ | paxys 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | I don't know if they have formally attempted this test in the last couple years, but I'm pretty sure any mainstream LLM will be able to crack it with ease. | | |
| ▲ | bryan0 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Definitely would not be easy. First of all the mainstream llms are trained to be honest, and this requires lying convincingly. Second, this involves 8 hours of interviews with expert judges, one "claudism" could give it away. | | |
| ▲ | paxys 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | All these problems can be fixed by a "pretend to be an average human to pass a turing test" prompt |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [deleted] |
