that would be a reasonable definition of AGI if everyone agree upon the specifics of the test, but that has never happened. Turing test is very much out of style, but I think that's because no one could even agree what the test was. I personally like the Kurzweil-Kapor version of the test and that is still unsettled: https://longbets.org/1/

▲

paxys 4 hours ago | parent [-]

I don't know if they have formally attempted this test in the last couple years, but I'm pretty sure any mainstream LLM will be able to crack it with ease.

▲

bryan0 an hour ago | parent [-]

Definitely would not be easy. First of all the mainstream llms are trained to be honest, and this requires lying convincingly. Second, this involves 8 hours of interviews with expert judges, one "claudism" could give it away.

	▲	paxys an hour ago \| parent [-]
		All these problems can be fixed by a "pretend to be an average human to pass a turing test" prompt