Remix.run Logo
biggc 2 days ago

> Additionally, Apple learned about Liu’s use of the schematic because he used it on a Mac mini which later synced via iCloud to the MacBook he took from Apple. Apple now also wants access to that Mac mini.

I'm very curious about the privacy implications of this. I know that anything I do and store on my company's laptop can be tracked, but I hadn't considered that if I forgot to sign out of my personal Gmail on it that they could legally search that information.

The files syncing to the company laptop's disk is a layer of nuance that makes this situation tricky to evaluate.

steveBK123 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

> I forgot to sign out of my personal Gmail

Never, ever, ever sign into personal mail/messaging on work machines. Even the appearance of having done so just sets up for bad things.

This was kinda iffy 20 years ago, now its crazy to do. We all have phones now, there's no good reason to do this.

mathisfun123 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

> Never, ever, ever sign into personal mail/messaging on work machines

apple explicitly encourages their employees to do exactly this - it's called "carry"ing your work device.

morganw 2 days ago | parent [-]

encourages, but doesn’t require. My work phone is an iPhone 14 that I only use for Slack notifications & to check the next day’s schedule when I don’t want to bother opening their laptop.

mathisfun123 2 days ago | parent [-]

i don't see your point - my point is apple actively encourages this thing that is being painted as terrible character flaw.

morganw 2 days ago | parent [-]

When Ashley Gjovik was fired, she complained the pressure to use work devices for personal stuff was considerable. I stopped carrying back then & haven’t felt any pressure.

A “carry” or “live on” device doesn’t have to be used for personal email and messages. It should just be used for more real-world non-test workloads. The lessons of only testing iPhone 4 in stealth cases hasn’t been forgottten.

I do agree that Apple likes to have it both ways, though.

mathisfun123 2 days ago | parent [-]

> I stopped carrying back then & haven’t felt any pressure.

if you're who i suspect you are, then you're being wholly disingenuous because you're not a dev. for a dev there is much more pressure.

morganw a day ago | parent [-]

Who I am is right there in the username (morganw), submissions & comments: Morgan Woodson. Not in SWE. Is it software if you write it in the hardware division?

Edited to add that I think EPMs are under more pressure to be Apple cheerleader than engineers.

itake 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

you're not wrong, but its really annoying carrying 2 laptops and 2 phones and 2 charging bricks [0].

Especially when work picks out the 16.2" laptop for you.

[0] - Yes, I know there are 3rd party multi-port USB-C charging products, but the wattage isn't as high as having 2 different bricks.

morkalork 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Hell, some employers are even helpful enough to block gmail, yahoo etc domains on their network.

Muromec 2 days ago | parent [-]

I can't open pretty much anything, including shoghoth face and linked in, but thankfully this imageboard and YouTube are spared. I still wonder how the powers that be didn't bother to ban npm on dev machines

2legit2quit 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> I'm very curious about the privacy implications of this. I know that anything I do and store on my company's laptop can be tracked, but I hadn't considered that if I forgot to sign out of my personal Gmail on it that they could legally search that information.

If it's work-related, work computer only. If it's anything personal, personal computer only. This is especially true for situations where companies are using screen capturing tools that capture the screen every 'x' seconds[0].

The seeming convenience of using your work computer for everything isn't worth the risk but some people don't consider the legal implications, as you've noted in your anecdote.

Once your personal message to Bob or Jane enters an official record because it's included in the eDiscovery (even if accidental) result(s), it's over.

Better to not have a surface risk like that, than assume the process will keep your personal data safe.

0 - https://desktime.com/features/time-tracking-with-screenshots

iAMkenough 2 days ago | parent [-]

I was under the impression that Apple requires its employees to login with personal Apple ID accounts for cloud storage.

> “You go through these steps of getting all your software set up, and all your devices provisioned to access internal Apple networks, and things like that. And it explicitly says you cannot use your corporate Apple account to set this up.”

https://cybersecurityventures.com/does-apple-spy-on-its-empl...

ndriscoll 2 days ago | parent [-]

How's that supposed to work? Apple requires employees to own Apple products or have a personal account in the first place? That doesn't sound believable.

sokoloff 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Requiring them to make a (free) Apple account doesn’t sound unreasonable.

“Go to https://account.apple.com/ and make one that doesn’t use your Apple corporate email” seems like a fair and legal work instruction to me.

ndriscoll 2 days ago | parent [-]

That seems crazy to me. I've always had my employers either provide or offer to provide me with anything I'll use for work. Asking someone to use a non-corporate-managed account for work seems especially insane to me. I've never heard of that.

sokoloff 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

I don’t see as much difference as you seem to see here.

Day 1 at FooCorp: “As part of onboarding, please set up these two accounts, both of which FooCorp operates and bears all the costs for.”

Day 1 at Apple: “As part of onboarding, please set up these two accounts, both of which Apple operates and bears all the costs for.”

ndriscoll 2 days ago | parent [-]

I've never heard of being asked by an employer to make an account associated to a non-work account (like a personal email). They should provision SSO, or at least use a company domain like apple.com or internal.apple.com for test accounts.

Day 1 at FooCorp: "Your email address is you@foocorp.com. Conducting business activities with personal accounts is against policy and may result in disciplinary action including termination. It may also be a regulatory violation depending on industry."

Arnt 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I assume they want the developers to dogfood the software they work on. Not crazy if so.

iAMkenough 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

This may have been an optional iCloud 2TB promotion for employees, but still relevant to the lawsuit.

I'm also under the impression that Apple requires its employees to dogfood their products and services. Hoping someone with personal experience and a lapsed NDA can chime in.

jubilanti 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Techies tend to associate access control with legal control. Nothing could be farther from the truth, especially when it comes to legal discovery and subpoenas.

And it gets worse. The 4th amendment protects against unreasonable searches from the government without a warrant, not all searches. If you have evidence on your personal devices that a judge believes could be relevant to the outcome of a criminal or civil trial, be prepared to give it up or face a potential evidence tampering / obstruction charge. Doesn't matter if you never signed into your personal Gmail on your work computer or not. In a trial where work records are important, your non-work devices and accounts can be subpoenaed if there is a good reason to believe you have work materials on your Gmail or personal laptop. Like if in the first review of work e-mails, they find you've e-mailed one work file from your work to your personal Gmail one time or even just have been signed onto your personal Gmail while at work.

Muromec 2 days ago | parent [-]

There is a difference between judge signed warrant and nosy CISO or HR person having feelings. A whole world of difference

slowin 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> I hadn't considered that if I forgot to sign out of my personal Gmail on it that they could legally search that information

I don't think this is true, this would still be unauthorized access on your employer's end and would be considered illegal. They're not allowed to pose as you to access your services iirc.

You should obviously still sign out (or never sign in in the first place) of course!

jubilanti 2 days ago | parent [-]

These things all vary across legal jurisdictions and with what you sign away in your contracts. If your contract doesn't say anything, then yes, your boss opening up your laptop while you're on lunch and reading through your logged-in but password-protected personal e-mail is not just a civil violation but gets into CFAA/wiretapping territory. California has some particularly strong default protections.

But you can 'freely' sign away these rights in your contract. Or if your contract binds you to follow internal policy and it's in the internal policy, that's usually enough notice and consent for the courts. When you're given a work device from a BigCo with a legal department that knows what they're doing, it usually comes with a EULA-style contract you don't read that authorizes everything.

California law does now say you can't be forced to give your employer your personal e-mail or social login, or other way of scanning your personal e-mail or socials. You can't sign this right away (just like you can't sign away your right to a minimum wage or workplace safety), but if you freely sign in while on a company device, network, and time, and your contract or policy is worded so broadly that anything you do on that device/network/time is the company's...

dkuntz2 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

at a previous job something we impressed on to people was you should not use work laptops for personal business, not because we want to go trawling through your personal stuff, but because if your work laptop becomes discovery material for legal proceedings, do you really want that lawyers you don't know digging through your personal email?

(relatedly, we told people not to sign into work stuff on personal computers because then they might have to turn over those computers for discovery)

lozenge 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I think I've heard about this before, apparently Apple encourages its employees to use the same iCloud account for personal and business use.

2 days ago | parent | next [-]
[deleted]
nozzlegear 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Yeah, from what I remember they have a funky iCloud file share thing set up for the whole company, and it requires them to either sign in with their personal iCloud account, or carry two iPhones (one for personal, one for work). Most employees understandably opt for the first option.