|
| ▲ | inigyou a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| How would you generate enough large PRs to count as "spam"? You could add gibberish or delete random lines of code but it was obviously not plausible looking. |
|
| ▲ | zeendo a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Obviously they could have. Obviously it's much easier now. |
|
| ▲ | Mawr a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You can cut down a tree regardless if you use a knife or a chainsaw. You can get to work each day regardless if you walk or drive. |
|
| ▲ | JohnHaugeland a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| this article is about the flood of junior developers who are producing enormous prs they’ve never seen full of untrustworthy code that a human hasn’t evaluated arguing that it’s possible to make them by hand isn’t just missing the point; it’s missing the entire discussion |
| |
| ▲ | Supermancho a day ago | parent [-] | | > arguing that it’s possible to make them by hand isn’t just missing the point; it’s missing the entire discussion >> Before they were not able to spam large PRs I was replying to someone insinuating that there was something I might have missed. Interjecting about the topical article, is a derail of this thread for some reason that is personal to you. Good luck with whatever. |
|
