| ▲ | Supermancho a day ago | |||||||
Why not? I'm pretty sure a developer could spam large PRs before and regardless of AI involvement is allowed or not. | ||||||||
| ▲ | inigyou a day ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
How would you generate enough large PRs to count as "spam"? You could add gibberish or delete random lines of code but it was obviously not plausible looking. | ||||||||
| ▲ | zeendo a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Obviously they could have. Obviously it's much easier now. | ||||||||
| ▲ | Mawr a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
You can cut down a tree regardless if you use a knife or a chainsaw. You can get to work each day regardless if you walk or drive. | ||||||||
| ▲ | JohnHaugeland a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
this article is about the flood of junior developers who are producing enormous prs they’ve never seen full of untrustworthy code that a human hasn’t evaluated arguing that it’s possible to make them by hand isn’t just missing the point; it’s missing the entire discussion | ||||||||
| ||||||||