This provides a method, but the data looks stale and perhaps a bit thin compared to say, Cursor, or even AntiGravity data.

▲

alainchabat a day ago | parent [-]

never heard of nanobot. how reliable is this benchmark?

▲

reilly3000 a day ago | parent | next [-]

I can’t speak to the veracity of the benchmarks but it appears their methodology is sound. Nanobot has 47k stars, fwiw https://github.com/HKUDS/nanobot

It has been more of an OpenClaw or Hermes alternative than a coding agent like OpenCode or Pi, so it’s likely to do well given less context bloat.

▲

cheeze a day ago | parent | prev [-]

IMO it's not. It's benchmarking GPT 5.4 and Opus 4.6. It's also missing Claude Code... one of the most popular harnesses (the most?)

	▲	hirako2000 a day ago \| parent [-]
		No Pi, no Aider either.