| ▲ | alainchabat a day ago | |||||||
never heard of nanobot. how reliable is this benchmark? | ||||||||
| ▲ | reilly3000 a day ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I can’t speak to the veracity of the benchmarks but it appears their methodology is sound. Nanobot has 47k stars, fwiw https://github.com/HKUDS/nanobot It has been more of an OpenClaw or Hermes alternative than a coding agent like OpenCode or Pi, so it’s likely to do well given less context bloat. | ||||||||
| ▲ | cheeze a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
IMO it's not. It's benchmarking GPT 5.4 and Opus 4.6. It's also missing Claude Code... one of the most popular harnesses (the most?) | ||||||||
| ||||||||