In this case the US State Department is accurately reciting what this organization says about itself openly: https://www.inventati.org/about

▲

culi 4 hours ago | parent [-]

> We support individuals, collectives, communities and groups whose political and social activities fit within this worldview and who share with us some fundamental principles: anti-fascism, anti-racism, anti-sexism, anti-militarism. On top of that, one has to share our basic attitude towards money and the capitalistic world: a deep feeling of uneasyness and unrest.

I don't see anything wrong with that. They make 0 money from this. It's 100% run by volunteers. They don't support any orgs that could afford to do it themselves.

It's like if a group of you and your friends got together and gave tech support to any orgs that care about something you're passionate about (e.g. ending FPTP voting)

▲

baobabKoodaa 4 hours ago | parent [-]

> I don't see anything wrong with that.

Did I say there was something wrong with that? No. Let me repeat what I said: "In this case the US State Department is accurately reciting what this organization says about itself openly". Do you disagree with this statement?

	▲	culi an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		No of course I don't. The State Department is alleging terrorism. In their own words they are alleging anti-racism, anti-sexism, anti-war, anti-fascism, etc. How could you possibly equate those?
	▲	Arainach 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		Opposing fascism and racism is not "radical left". It's centrism. The State Department's words are not A/I's.
	▲	iAMkenough an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		If your definition of “radical left” is “anti-racism” you would be right.