> We support individuals, collectives, communities and groups whose political and social activities fit within this worldview and who share with us some fundamental principles: anti-fascism, anti-racism, anti-sexism, anti-militarism. On top of that, one has to share our basic attitude towards money and the capitalistic world: a deep feeling of uneasyness and unrest.

I don't see anything wrong with that. They make 0 money from this. It's 100% run by volunteers. They don't support any orgs that could afford to do it themselves.

It's like if a group of you and your friends got together and gave tech support to any orgs that care about something you're passionate about (e.g. ending FPTP voting)

▲

baobabKoodaa 7 hours ago | parent [-]

> I don't see anything wrong with that.

Did I say there was something wrong with that? No. Let me repeat what I said: "In this case the US State Department is accurately reciting what this organization says about itself openly". Do you disagree with this statement?

▲

Arainach 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Opposing fascism and racism is not "radical left". It's centrism.

The State Department's words are not A/I's.

	▲	jpcfl 27 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Antifa is not centrist
	▲	mlindner 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Being against facism and racism is centrism, being part of an "anti-fascist" or "anti-racist" group is radical left. If you're part of a "group" that has stated goals of pushing something that is already a norm then its pretty clear what what you're doing is not pushing for what is already the norm as if it was the norm you wouldn't need to push for it.

▲

culi 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

No of course I don't. The State Department is alleging terrorism. In their own words they are alleging anti-racism, anti-sexism, anti-war, anti-fascism, etc.

How could you possibly equate those?

▲

4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]