| ▲ | Engineered yeast for converting plastic and biomass compounds into food(acs.digitellinc.com) |
| 36 points by ehwa37 4 hours ago | 28 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | spockz 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Maybe the only thing more worrisome than microplastics everywhere is unstoppable plastics eating organisms everywhere, eating through all plastics everywhere. |
| |
| ▲ | ch4s3 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Usually these bioengineered yeasts need pretty specific growth conditions in order to eat in this case ethylene glycol, not raw finished plastic. In this case they say "plastic-derived substrates" which means they're pre-processing the waste plastic. | | |
| ▲ | cortesoft 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Good thing microorganisms are famous for their slow rate of change in dynamic environments… | | |
| ▲ | ch4s3 an hour ago | parent [-] | | I'm not sure what this adds. The yeast here is chomping ethylene glycol for carbon, and tons of soil bacteria can already do that. And I should add that highly specialized industrial/lab yeasts have existed for a long time and aren't prevalent in the environment, they just don't like to grow outside of narrow(ish) conditions. Highly prevalent wild yeasts tend to eat a variety of sugars, not glycol. |
|
| |
| ▲ | ryanisnan 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Reminds me of the Taumoeba escaping the Xenonite enclosures. | |
| ▲ | masklinn 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Timescale is the important bit. If organisms degrade plastics in a few hundred years then what plastics are uniquely valuable for will be quite fine indeed. | |
| ▲ | fc417fc802 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Perhaps soon you'll be needing to apply stains or sealants to your outdoor plastic items. Maybe even purchase treated plastic products that we worry leach toxic chemicals into their surroundings. | |
| ▲ | simmerup 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Why is that worrisome? Might give the fish a chance whose bellies are filling up with plastic rubbish | | |
| ▲ | serf 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | for all the reasons in the book/movie/television show 'The Andromeda Strain'. |
| |
| ▲ | piloto_ciego 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | There’s a fantastically silly but fun book about this the name of which eludes me. | | | |
| ▲ | righthand 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Such as in The Andromeda Strain? | |
| ▲ | weaksauce 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | there was a time in history before fungus came along and ate trees so there were just a huge amount of trees around that couldn't decay. (which is why we have coal actually) this could be something akin to that. |
|
|
| ▲ | mbil 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If you don't eat your biomass compound goo, you can't have any PlastiYum bacterial sludge |
|
| ▲ | waschl 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Is there any of this ”bacteria converting plastic to fuel/food/neutral stuff“ actually applied anywhere at scale under economically reasonably conditions? |
|
| ▲ | ninalanyon 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| There was a Doomwatch episode on his subject with airliners falling out of the sky bcause all the plastic had been eaten away. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doomwatch#Series_One |
| |
|
| ▲ | thisisauserid 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| In 2011 researchers identified a fungus named pestalotiopsis microspora. It gained widespread attention because it can digest polyurethane plastic and survive entirely in anaerobic conditions, making it a prime candidate for deployment at the bottom of landfills. I for one look forward to serving this underground deity. |
|
| ▲ | metalman an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| soilent goo, again! you, yes you, area "biomass compound", well maybe not quite yet, but soon, as these things go, but most definitly every last putrid smelly horrible thing is a "biomass compound", and when you add in plastic we are talking about most of the stuff found in millions of dumpsters, and most of the stuff actualy in dumps, or sewers. This then solves the whole issue of what is allowed to go in which can or bin, which is anything you cant get money for or find someone who will hall it away for free. I am very very sure that volunteers will soon show up wishing to "return to the great nutrient cycle" but there is nothing to worry about as I am positive that everything will be tested and cynicly proven to be safe for human consumption |
|
| ▲ | hkt 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Honestly at this point I think the way to go may be to stop using plastics where they're not absolutely required, and to subsequently burn what goes into landfill while producing electricity and reclaiming heat. Better that than this. |
| |
| ▲ | fc417fc802 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Burn it? With all the talk of carbon capture? Recall that plastic literally consists of a mass of hydrocarbons. Why not bury it? | | |
| ▲ | axus 35 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I think the legitimate answer was groundwater contamination, but that should be solved for other things we bury. I'm on board for non-biodegradable plastic trash sequestration |
| |
| ▲ | Loughla 36 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | How do you define 'not absolutely required'? |
|
|
| ▲ | itsrobreally 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| And here I thought we were going to be fed insects when we hit final-stage capitalism |
| |