"Safe way to make sure I will stop being your customer - also YES!"

I don't think they care at all about the size of graphene os market share

if its jeopardize entire userbase then its not worth it

Fine by me. My example illustrates their incompetence if they are willing to let a user with an OS that hasn't received any updates in half a decade, then clearly, they don't give a single crap about security.

▲

tonyhart7 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Noo, it’s the other way around lmao.

A financial security audit is one of the most thorough security audits you can ask for in software.

GrapheneOS gets blocked because it doesn’t follow the secure system requirements (root).

	▲	axegon_ 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I suggest you read up the graphene documentation.
	▲	inexcf 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		What requirements does it not follow? >(root) GrapheneOS is not rooted.
	▲	ruszki 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		As several others have already said here, GrapheneOS is not necessarily rooted. So that's a lie. Also, I've seen such audits internally, and they don't care about security at all. They care about the theatrics of security waaaaay more. For example, I was at Santander in 2024, during its huge data breach. Here is the list of actions which are supposed to prevent the same kind of attacks again in the future: - Yeah, it's an empty list. But of course, they made our life more difficult. In the end, I literally had more permission than before, because they were even sloppier than before. But of course, I had to change my password more frequently, and I had to type it about 5x more.

▲

dylan604 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I'm sure their automatic bans have happened to more people than the number of grapheneOS users