Fine by me. My example illustrates their incompetence if they are willing to let a user with an OS that hasn't received any updates in half a decade, then clearly, they don't give a single crap about security.

▲

tonyhart7 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Noo, it’s the other way around lmao.

A financial security audit is one of the most thorough security audits you can ask for in software.

GrapheneOS gets blocked because it doesn’t follow the secure system requirements (root).

	▲	axegon_ 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I suggest you read up the graphene documentation.
	▲	inexcf 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		What requirements does it not follow? >(root) GrapheneOS is not rooted.
	▲	ruszki 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		As several others have already said here, GrapheneOS is not necessarily rooted. So that's a lie. Also, I've seen such audits internally, and they don't care about security at all. They care about the theatrics of security waaaaay more. For example, I was at Santander in 2024, during its huge data breach. Here is the list of actions which are supposed to prevent the same kind of attacks again in the future: - Yeah, it's an empty list. But of course, they made our life more difficult. In the end, I literally had more permission than before, because they were even sloppier than before. But of course, I had to change my password more frequently, and I had to type it about 5x more.