| ▲ | dgunay 11 hours ago |
| I have immense respect for the incredible work that the Asahi team does, but at the rate that Intel and AMD have been catching up on power efficiency I wonder whether anyone will really _have_ to run Linux on M series laptops. There was a clear case for it back when Apple silicon absolutely dominated anything else you could buy but with Panther Lake I'm not so sure that Apple's lead will continue to be big enough to justify needing to wait several years for full Linux hardware compatibility to be reverse engineered. |
|
| ▲ | euio757 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| But, power efficiency isn't the primary reason I'd like Apple hardware with linux software. Display quality, trackpad quality, overall form factor, and very high RAM space in a laptop would be the primary reasons I'd go with Asahi Linux. |
| |
| ▲ | aucisson_masque 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Yeah, people miss that about apple laptop. Find me another laptop that has everything, even if it's more expensive ! You can't, some have keyboard as good, some it's the display. In best case you got 2 or 3 things but then it goes downhill on the other, like the trackpad. | |
| ▲ | Gud 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I agree. I’ve been a big Lenovo fan, settled on the X1 carbon. I’ve had three of them, G5, G6 and G9. The USB-C port broke on both G6 and G9 models. Apparently it’s a common problem. Unfortunately the ports are soldered directly on the motherboard making it difficult to fix(should be a small separate board for easy replacement). I was going to desolder and replace the ports, but haven’t gotten around to it. I’m now using a MacBook Pro M2. | | |
| ▲ | danw1979 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Ummm if repairability is a concern, I’ve got some news to share about your new Macbook. | | |
| ▲ | tacticalturtle an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I replaced some parts on my M1 MacBook Air. For 90% of the parts it’s honestly pretty easy to work with. You just need a few screwdrivers. And I sourced all my parts from eBay. The documentation is excellent: https://support.apple.com/en-us/100586 The only thing that’s egregious is the batteries.
They tape the batteries to the case, and to remove them you have to do this complex twirling motion with tweezers to pull the tape out from under the battery. If the tape snaps during this then the documentation basically says get a new case. | |
| ▲ | simonh 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If the ports don't effing break in the first place, who cares? | |
| ▲ | Gud 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | No, repair ability is only important if it’s crappy quality to begin with. | |
| ▲ | nicce 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > I’ve got some news to share about your new Macbook. As long as you pay for Apple Care, not a problem. But maybe not the point… | |
| ▲ | mschuster91 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Apple saves itself a lot of the trouble with superior build quality. With Samsung devices (so no cheap crap), USB ports last me about three years of heavy use. With my old iPhone 12, 2019 16-inch MBP or my 2022 MBA? Not a single issue. The housing is simply constructed so tight and, being made of solid metal, rigid that the housing bears the torsion load and not the tiny PCB solder pads. The only problem I have with my new USB-C iPhone 15 is that it is hard to clean pocket lint out of the socket, compared to the old Lightning connector. | | |
| ▲ | spankibalt 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | > With Samsung devices (so no cheap crap), USB ports last me about three years of heavy use. What are you doing to these machines?! I work in the safety and security biz, including in the field, and my trusty HP EliteBook 2730p is still rocking along on its first USB ports. That machine is over 15 bloody years old! | | |
| ▲ | centizen an hour ago | parent [-] | | That is a convertible laptop that meets MIL-STD-810F standards on vibration resistance, it’s not really a fair comparison. Also, the change from dedicated charge ports to USB-C charging increased USB port usage considerably. | | |
| ▲ | spankibalt an hour ago | parent [-] | | > Also, the change from dedicated charge ports to USB-C charging increased USB port usage considerably. I never needed one, but a good USB-C adapter (or maybe even small dock) with power passthrough should solve this. Burning through whole machines because a single USB-C port cakes out after just three years is an awful lot of waste. |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | rowanG077 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This is exactly why I run asahi. There really is not a laptop that comes close to the hardware quality of an apple laptop. I have even sacrificed x86 at the altar which is a much bigger step than battery life imo. | |
| ▲ | spankibalt 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Display quality, trackpad quality, overall form factor, and very high RAM space in a laptop would be the primary reasons I'd go with [an Apple]. Heh, that's precisely one grouping of reasons I avoid Apple, especially with regards to trackpads and form factor (and, to a lesser degree, displays). | |
| ▲ | DrScientist 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > trackpad quality This |
|
|
| ▲ | raybb 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That's fair but also think about the ewaste. I'm still hoping one of these mega AI LLMs will figure out how to install Linux on the many old iPads that become nearly useless after Apple stops updating them and you can't install new apps. |
| |
| ▲ | dgunay 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Oh definitely, there's great value in it for those who already own Macbooks for one reason or another. I just personally have found myself shying away from buying a Macbook multiple times over the years because the Asahi Linux experience was really really rough at the time & probably still is for the generations I would be interested in buying. | |
| ▲ | ZiiS 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Please send all "ewaste" Apple silicon macbooks to me. |
|
|
| ▲ | vb-8448 27 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Make an example of something comparable to a MacBook Pro M series, and I'll buy it asap! I really want to go back to linux, but mbp is just too good! |
|
| ▲ | randusername an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yeah, I'm optimistic we're getting really close to "forever laptops" once competing hardware catches up on efficiency. What do I need any higher specs for, other than battery life? |
| |
| ▲ | skohan an hour ago | parent [-] | | As someone who does a lot of work with local LLM's, today's systems feel woefully under-powered. I'm looking forward to a future where my laptop has 10x the memory, 100x the memory bandwidth, and optimized cores to make inference workflows that currently take minutes or hours go down to seconds or milliseconds. While we're at the point where traditional software is pretty much fast enough for all but extreme use-cases, with LLM's it feels like we're back to the days where you press compile and go have a coffee or chat to your colleague. |
|
|
| ▲ | benoau 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It depends on how long Apple want to support the devices, if the support matches the longevity of the devices maybe nobody really needs Asahi. I believe all Intel Macs have received their final macOS version now so it is almost time for Apple to make that decision for the M1 generation. I think an M1 Pro, Max or Ultra (or even an M1 with 16GB of RAM) still has many good years left. |
| |
| ▲ | selfhoster1312 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | OS LTS support barely matters when planned obsolescence is baked in at the hardware level. Wearing parts (eg. SSD) are soldered on newer macs and there's intensive efforts to make sure even if you have the tools you can't repair it. Parts aren't available but if you get your hands on there's cryptographic parts pairing so it more or less can't be replaced: https://rossmanngroup.com/services/ssd-data-recovery/macbook... Overall, i wouldn't count on "many good years left". | | |
| ▲ | kalleboo 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | My MacBook Pro M1 is 5 years old now and the SSD wear level is at 4%. SSD wear is not a problem for normal users. Meanwhile Apple's standard OS support period is 7 years, that's a much more imminent limit. Not saying that I support non-user-replaceable SSDs, but if your goal is reducing e-waste, there are more impactful changes to make. | | |
| ▲ | selfhoster1312 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Thanks, that's a fair data point. Although i'm sure it depends on actual user workloads. I'm not saying that I support closed-source firmware, locked bootloaders, or even that replacing SSDs is the one true path to sustainability. I believe it's a whole field and we shouldn't tolerate compromises on any level. It should be 100% illegal in any civilized country to sell the kind of lame hardware we have today. It should be 100% repairable, 100% open bootloader & free firmware, 100% public tech docs/datasheets. Original manufacturer OS support is not insignificant, but i believe it's only significant because we have so little control/understanding of the hardware/software stack. | | |
| ▲ | hnaccount_rng 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | You have trade offs though. Both with added effort during the development but also just physical limits with the amount of additional losses you have over clicked vs soldered connections | | |
| ▲ | selfhoster1312 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | That's true. I can't say i'm 100% against soldering parts, that would be silly. What concerns me is that undocumented parts that are unavailable to buy as spare parts are soldered and have firmware that enforces pairing with a specific other part. It would be reasonable if all components on a motherboard had to be sold as spare parts by law (not just the entire board that costs the same as the entire device, that's malicious compliance) and all spec sheets were made available. That might just make the economy of a repair shop work again. |
| |
| ▲ | kalleboo 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Totally agree that lawmakers need to crack down on locked-down hardware. The DMA crap that the EU passed even seems to go in the wrong direction, allowing Apple to audit the financials of anyone who makes an iOS app. I was mostly just reacting to your "barely matters" wording :) |
| |
| ▲ | a96 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The thing about SSD failures is that in normal use, you can't wear one out. But in perfectly normal use, some of the units just die after N years (for very small number N in some cases). They don't warn. They don't show increased fault or wear counters. They just die and completely disappear from the bus and stop accepting any commands. There is no recovery and, I repeat, no warning. That's why you have backups and drives are easy to replace, though reinstall/restore can be tedious. Unless it's a soldered in one. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | GeekyBear an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Intel has stopped pushing clock speeds to such ridiculous extremes, so battery life is getting better. However they still have to nail single core performance on chips that can operate without a fan before they can be said to have caught up. |
|
| ▲ | gehsty 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Does anyone have to run Linux on an M series? I’m fairly confident it’s one of the most complex ways of running Linux… |
| |
| ▲ | soganess 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yeah, but there was a time when running Linux on a laptop was one of the most complex ways of running Linux. Now I just expect everything to work, especially if I buy from Lenovo, Dell, or HP. There was a time when Wi-Fi, or Wayland, or XComposite, or Linux gaming, or just accelerated graphics at all or, or, or... People get excited, they work on it, other people get excited and mess about, and eventually it just works. I would love to one day pick up a decommissioned M1 Ultra and use my OS of choice on it, and I'm grateful for the people who are doing the hard thing now. |
|
|
| ▲ | swozey 28 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You can't run an egpu (amd or nvidia) on macos so that's one thing I could see switching for. I did just discover tinygrad though due to a hackernews comment, but not sure its performance. Also Tahoes absolutely horrendous performance for the last year.. |
|
| ▲ | maccard 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| What Laptop would you purchase that gives hardware equivalent to a MacBook Pro? |
|
| ▲ | oblio 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > wait several years for full Linux hardware compatibility I'm not convinced it's only "several years". Asahi was launched in January 2021. So 5 and a half years ago. Asahi, as far as I can tell, supports most of M1 and M2 features, so generations launched in November 2020 (6 years ago) and June 2022 (4 years ago). I would be very surprised if a decade from now the story won't still be the same thing: 90% of features for systems half a decade old with software package gaps in important areas and everything slightly less optimized than MacOS. Asahi is doing incredible work but it's still 5 people in a garage vs the huge corporation. |
| |
| ▲ | regexorcist 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | > 90% of features for systems half a decade old This can be a good tradeoff. An M1 Ultra still runs circles around 90% of consumer hardware sold today, and with Linux it has easily another 10+ years. Now support for M3 is coming. > Asahi is doing incredible work but it's still 5 people in a garage vs the huge corporation. Not sure why the "vs" scenario, this is a project that makes no promises. And I think they do have some support from Fedora / Red Hat fwiw. | | |
| ▲ | selfhoster1312 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > This can be a good tradeoff. That's a good tradeoff for durable hardware with available spare parts. That's not a good tradeoff for hardware that was designed so it cannot be repaired, such as newer Macs. | |
| ▲ | oblio 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Not sure why the "vs" scenario, this is a project that makes no promises. And I think they do have some support from Fedora / Red Hat fwiw. They are building something in an environment that's not supportive of what they're doing. Contrast with Intel or AMD. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | dmitrygr 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > but at the rate that Intel and AMD have been catching up on power efficiency Have they? What AMD or Intel laptop with Linux on it can hold a candle to and M4 air or an M4max pro? Genuinely curious, cause I found none... |
| |
| ▲ | Mashimo 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Framework 13 pro with new Intel chips claims to run 20h of 4k Netflix stream, or 17h of light web browsing @250 nits. That said these numbers are with windows. | | |
| ▲ | Lio 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | So the hardware is capable but the Linux distros aren’t quite there yet? Fingers crossed for them then. I love the idea of a Framework laptop but I’m only interested in Linux performance. | | |
| ▲ | Mashimo 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | > but the Linux distros aren’t quite there yet? I just went by what Framework said on release a few weeks or month back. Maybe you can find a more up to date Linux test somewhere. And I bet you can soon get a ThinkPad with the same intel chip, that should have similar battery life. | | |
| ▲ | mike97 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | > And I bet you can soon get a ThinkPad with the same intel chip, that should have similar battery life. Yes you can, speaking from experience. I have the T14 gen 7 with the 75 wh battery, and the 356H CPU, it only uses 4-6w/hour when coding with a lot of browser tabs open, a headless VM running, docker containers and so on, online meetings is about 6-8w/hour, this is under Linux, with default power setting from Opensuse. It can easily last more than 10 working hours, I limit mine to 80% charge as it's more than enough for when I'm on the go. | | |
| ▲ | Mashimo 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Nice. I still rock the Gen 1 or 2 T14. Works for me, just wish I had a better display. It's possible to upgrade it, just so much conflicting information out there. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | jaimex2 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | No idea but my Framework 12 goes for days without charging. I really haven't seen any real world need for M chips. Granted Im not compiling large projects on a train all day but who is. | | |
| ▲ | finaard 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The main power advantage of the apple chips is when the system is mostly idle - under mid to high load power to watt has been comparable for a few years already (at least AMD and Apple, intel was way behind - but I guess they caught up recently). The main reason behind my M3 MBP back then wasn't so much power efficiency - but that I can get it with 96GB of RAM. It's nice that I can go a full office day without charging - the previous x86 notebook couldn't, but a decent one from the M3 generation probably could as well. But also if I put proper load an that thing the Macbook battery is done in less than 2 hours. | |
| ▲ | zakisaad 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | raises hand, but point taken when painting with broad strokes | |
| ▲ | porridgeraisin 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Framework 12 ... days without charging I don't see how? it is a 50Wh battery. Even at 6W that is about 8h of usage? On what OS + workload on x86 are you seeing just 6W usage? Or is it that each day your usage is only 2 hours? | | |
| ▲ | delamon 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | My amd thinkpad idles at 3w, watching youtube is about 4.5-5w. | |
| ▲ | jaimex2 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It's probably 2-3 hours a day. Runs latest Kubuntu currently. |
|
| |
| ▲ | oblio 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | AMD Strix Halo? | | |
| ▲ | dmitrygr 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | "up to 9 hours for light web browsing or everyday tasks" that is 1/3 the battery life of a macbook in the same use case. seems completely incomparable | | |
| ▲ | darkwater 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I have a M1 Pro from work and it surely won't last that while working. Throw some video calls at it and working outside (so, screen at the brightest level) and at the end of the work day I have to plug it in | | | |
| ▲ | prmoustache 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Who works 27h straight far away from a power or usb outlet? | | |
| ▲ | pmontra 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Probably nobody and I remember when a phone battery lasted one week: nevertheless sometimes we forgot to charge and we run out of battery. So a long lasting battery is good, too long lasting is a waste, which maybe it's your point. However nowadays it could mean running some agents all day long (remote models) and plug in to power only at the end of the day. |
| |
| ▲ | izacus 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | No MacBook runs for 27 hours even if it says so in spec sheet. My 16" doesn't come close to apple claims. (Did we really forget how inflated Apple battery claims really are?) |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | gigatexal 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Even if amd or intel caught up the Apple hardware is just built better and is far higher quality. |
| |
| ▲ | monegator 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | i snatched a lenovo yoga slim aura with a core 5 226 for 650 euro. Its build quality is on par if not better than the colleague's macbook, it's pretty good for working, runs fedora natively, battery last at least 12 hours unless i'm playing games. | | |
| ▲ | fooker 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The build quality is not even close. And macbooks are reaching 18-20 hours usage on battery nowadays, I have stopped carrying the power adapter most of the time. Of course it’s significantly more expensive, but you do get what you pay for. | |
| ▲ | kmarc 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I'm a bit opponent of Apple's walled garden, but the build quality of this laptop is quite far away from a MacBook... Except the display, this OLED WXHQwhatever is stunning. Source: I bought the same (with core i7, so it's performant, etc.). |
| |
| ▲ | reeredfdfdf 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Higher-end Thinkpads are pretty nice in terms of build quality. Trackpads and screens are worse, but they will physically last just as long. |
|