| ▲ | krapp 2 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I noticed some time ago, at least on HN, that almost no one refers to "people" anymore, only to "humans," with a sort of clinical detachment. I don't know if it's part of the same phenomenon but it is kind of creepy, like realizing you're surrounded by replicants. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | unrented7977 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
We'd be using "human" in the same way if we'd met an alien race, for example. LLMs are not alive, of course, nor will they be. But personally I think that artificial sentience counts as a distinct lifeform just as much as aliens would. But I think it's pretty unambiguous that there's a difference between "person" and "homo sapiens". That's why people are using the term human to disambiguate. Our current level of "AI" are not persons, but an artificial sentience would most certainly be, as would be aliens, and certain animals on Earth once we learn to communicate with them. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | apparent 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Really? I don't think I've ever written the word "humans" here, except perhaps when distinguishing people from rats/mice/etc. I also don't recall seeing people use "humans" excessively, or in a way that sounded off to me. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||