Remix.run Logo
doublepg23 8 hours ago

I guess my brain has been cooked by internet libertarianism but what's the basis of a C&D for proxying a website?

Is the legal basis just copyright of the contents?

xmprt 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Bigger "guns" diplomacy. They don't need any legal basis for a C&D. Just depends on whether you have enough money to fight it in court.

john_strinlai 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

i dont know the legal basis used, or the validity. i just know that i wouldnt want to have to spend the time or money fighting twitter over it

paxys 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Well yeah the copyright violation is pretty clear cut here.

itintheory 6 hours ago | parent [-]

My understanding is that copyright of what's posted is retained by the poster. The Nitter C&D was around a ToS violation for scraping.