| ▲ | joshstrange 5 hours ago |
| Due to pricing insanity (not that Apple prices weren’t insane before the ram/ssd shortages) I’m not in the market but I do wonder if my next computer should be a Mac Studio instead of a MBP that lives its life docked. Might be better to just run a Studio and Neo for the very few times I actually need remote capabilities. |
|
| ▲ | PaulRobinson 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I've been thinking about this a fair bit recently. We make a lot of price/performance compromises for having an attached screen and keyboard on our computer. That was what got me started. Then I remembered the days of having to go to a special corner of the house to use a computer, vs now when I have a computer with me all the time. In my bag, on the sofa, on the train. Hell, I'm writing this on the work MBP while waiting for an appointment. And you know what, I think I got more done when I went and sat in a corner of the house all those years ago. I set up an area for "computer work", and it worked really well. I have a home office, but it's a jumble of cables going into docking stations and all sorts of weird stuff. I think if I streamline it and turn it into a proper "computer room", I might get some of that mojo back. I might even convince my partner that surrendering the home office and having a corner of the den might be good - she can watch TV while I tinker. And I won't be balancing a laptop on my knee and trying to do two things at once. And the price/performance thing comes back in. Hmm. |
| |
| ▲ | AshleyGrant 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | There is a definite mental aspect for most WFH folks to having a space that is dedicated to work. I'm not unique in saying this, but the way I put it is "If you work from anywhere in your house, then you're always at work." And that, from mental load standpoint, is not healthy for most folks. | |
| ▲ | simgt 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I've done that, but I chose a Framework Desktop instead. The latest Fedora is closer to Snow Leopard than anything Apple has to offer. Downside is that I still have my MBP because of the lock-in and occasionally pick it up to do computer stuff in weird places. | | |
| ▲ | ahknight 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | I got used to the hub-and-spoke model at home (previously thin terminal, server-client, etc.). Big ole desktop/server and smaller devices that (ab)use it remotely. Roam around with a smaller computer/tablet/phone. Tailscale to bind it all together. If your computing needs line up, it's a very serviceable approach. |
| |
| ▲ | mort96 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I went some time without a desktop computer at home. The idea was, I have a perfectly good laptop, I'll just connect it with a dock when I want to use a desktop-like device. Never ended up happening. I didn't get much done at home at all and what I did get done was mostly on the couch; not a great environment for serious work. (I have an office where I do for-profit work so it's not an issue, but still, I like my side projects too) Eventually I had enough decommissioned computer parts that I could assemble them and re-commission them into a working desktop. So I now have a desktop again. And I actually end up sitting at the desk working on stuff on the desktop in a way I rarely did with the laptop. | |
| ▲ | alexdobrenko 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | BRING BACK THE COMPUTER ROOM | | | |
| ▲ | jareklupinski an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | every time i try to 'streamline the computer setup' i get reminded that losing 'the desk' was the worst part / saddest moment | |
| ▲ | flaunf221 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | To me the idea of working on (non-docked) laptop always seemed like an idea that you would do only if there is no other possible way. Screen is small and is only one.
Ergonomics is entirely messed up. Either your screen is too low, or your keyboard is too high. Keyboards are non-ergonomic and have to be made with compromises due to height limits. Touchpad instead of mouse/trackball is compromise for many - and also stuck at one position. And yet they have somehow spread despite number of people going on business trips not really increasing. | | |
| ▲ | jmalicki 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | You can dock your laptop at work, then dock it at home, take it with you to a meeting room at work to browse supplemental materials and/or project your screen n the meeting, and use it for the occasional trip (like using it on the train to work). It's not like you have to be on a plane for the portability to be useful. | |
| ▲ | thefaux 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It sounds like you don't code much in bed or with your feet up. A laptop is a distinct tool from a desktop and if you try to use it like a desktop, I agree it is a terrible substitute. Personally I find laptops vastly more ergonomic than a desktop, but I never program with my feet on the ground. | | |
| ▲ | matheusmoreira an hour ago | parent [-] | | > code much in bed I've found my smartphone's the best device for that. I wrote an entire programming language using my phone. Been trying to make a handheld cyberdeck to replace the phone with something better, but it's still a long way from being real. |
|
| |
| ▲ | ModernMech 10 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | [dead] |
|
|
| ▲ | pantulis 7 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| YMMV, but when I got my iPad I realized that my "mobile" needs were only contempt consumption and my MBP was used as a desktop computer connected to a 32'' monitor. So every time I renewed my laptop the expensive screen went with it, and I had to pay for another one that I would be using as a second screen! Thus, my current workhorse is a Studio. |
|
| ▲ | jmalicki 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Why not a non-mac cheaper desktop/workstation and a Mac laptop for use? E.g. what most major tech companies have - a laptop that is for VSCode via ssh/web browsing, and a beefy Linux dev box you ssh into for everything else? It's way cheaper, and what I use at home too - a lot cheaper than a Mac studio for everything, especially with RAM and storage. |
| |
| ▲ | mswphd 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | if you do want to do local LLM stuff, mac studio is significantly better than most linux dev boxes. | |
| ▲ | dannyw 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | A lot more upgradable too. Those empty DRAM slots can get populated one day! | |
| ▲ | sylens 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The unified memory is the big appeal of a beefy Mac Studio |
|
|
| ▲ | ThouYS 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Having replaced my MacBook with a Mac Mini, I would reconsider. The MacBook is just such a _complete_ package. Great speakers, great keyboard, fantastic screen, the fingerprint sensor thingy.. Takes a lot of gear to match that |
| |
| ▲ | frollogaston 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I thought the question was low-end MacBook + mini vs high-end MacBook. The low-end one has all those nice things. I wouldn't sacrifice that. If it has to be MacBook + super old used mini as home server, so be it. | | |
| ▲ | jmalicki 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Except for LLM inference speed, macs suck as a server and are pretty expensive, why wouldn't you get a Linux box? | | |
| ▲ | JohnBooty 39 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Buying a Mac specifically for serving is misguided in nearly all use cases, but as an all-in-one solution they make sense. Personally I feel like the number of boxes I need to manage has an inverse correlation to my happiness. Macs are totally “fine” for light server duty… as is just about any computer of the last decade+. The CPUs are beasts, the disks are screaming fast. The operating system itself may not be ideal at serving but you can just run Docker/Orbstack if you need to do something especially Linux-y. I’d put the question back on you — what are scenarios where an Apple Silicon Mac wouldn’t cut it as a light server for one person or a handful of people? About the only scenario that comes to mind is scenarios where you expect to utilize it so heavily that the fans are running for many hours a day. At some point those are either gonna wear out or just ingest so much dust that the machine runs hotter and needs a deep clean. But even that is largely mitigated by just pointing an external fan at it. | |
| ▲ | frollogaston 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Because it's not exactly a server, more like a home PC / dev machine that I also remote into. Usually SSHing but sometimes VNC which is annoying in Linux. And the Mac mini is pretty fast. Yes a Linux box would win in terms of multicore CPU(?) or GPU if you need to run big batch processes, or a high-uptime service. My work is running those on cloud, not in my house. |
|
| |
| ▲ | cj 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If your computer never leaves your desk, the iMac is pretty competitive with those features. Even comes with a TouchID keyboard. | | |
| ▲ | mikestew 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | I’ve had iMacs for almost 20 years. My last one was indeed my last. Without target display mode (use the Mac as a monitor), I’m ditching a perfectly good monitor. I was going to buy a Mac Studio and a good monitor to replace the iMac until the spouse reminded me that we are now retired and will spend time in a camper. So a MBP for me (and BenQ’s Mac-specific monitor), but others might do well to consider a Mac Mini/Studio. iMacs are great for a lot of use cases, but my image of the typical HN user would prefer to keep the monitor separate. | | |
| ▲ | frollogaston 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It's like, you pay laptop prices for laptop performance but without laptop portability or desktop modularity. This only sorta made sense back when Apple had no "prosumer" desktop offering unless you wanted a cheap used Mac Pro (which is what I ended up doing at some point). | |
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
| |
| ▲ | pebble 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Not an option if you're trying to drive 3 decent screens. | | |
| ▲ | jedberg 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | My M1 Pro drives 4 screens no problem. The trick is that you can only attach two through one Thunderbolt port, so you have to attach the 3rd one via the other port instead of your dock. (The 4th screen is the laptop's built in screen) | | |
| ▲ | frollogaston 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Keyword is pro. Non-pro chips drive fewer screens unless you use DisplayLink. Which I did at some point, it's a hack but ok for lighter usage. | | |
| ▲ | jedberg an hour ago | parent [-] | | Yes but if your debate is desktop or laptop, you're probably not looking at anything but a pro. | | |
| ▲ | frollogaston an hour ago | parent [-] | | Uh idk, I have a desktop and laptop that are both base. The laptop is an M4 Air which is overall faster than M1 Pro, especially single-core where it's even faster than M3 Max. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | joshstrange 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Macbook (base) yes, but my MBP (M3 Max) is driving 4 screens for me without issue. | |
| ▲ | frollogaston 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Honestly the screens become more of a liability than an asset to me past 2 (including the laptop screen). I've tried. Even if I'm knee deep in work and have like 4 servers I'm monitoring, my eyes are only going to look at one screen at a time, so it's just extra window management and eye/head/mouse movement to have more screens. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | frollogaston 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| My goto. Even ignoring speed, it's nice to have a remote machine that keeps doing whatever it's doing while your laptop is closed. And the ARM Macs idle at such low power that it's not wasteful like my MacPro4,1 was haha. My UPS's ammeter doesn't even display the Mac mini's draw. They gave me a nice MBP for my new job. I tried doing heavy work on it locally, it was fine for that, and yet it still ended up being a light terminal into an EC2 instance, partially because their stuff is on AWS and latency is way lower within that. My personal mini is running too. |
|
| ▲ | rafaelmn 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I would not use Neo, Air with 24 GB ram should be your minimum because you will want to do some work locally even when you're running a VPN/SSH thin client setup. I'm currently SSH-ing into my workstation from my M4 Air with 24 gb ram and it's ideal for this flow. Slack/editors/clients/browsers/etc. easily gobble up over 16 GB. I have no more dev tools/compilers/source on my client machines, everything is dockered up on remote workstation in isolated VMs (too much supply-chaining). My only downside to using a pro is not having 120/4k HDMI port on air and my dock won't support it with Apple (it does with windows) |
| |
| ▲ | bilsbie an hour ago | parent [-] | | Can that run qwen? Also can you explain what you meant by the downside ? | | |
| ▲ | rafaelmn 20 minutes ago | parent [-] | | If I was going to run LLMs locally I would definitely go for a pro. I meant the only downside of not using a pro for my use-case is that I don't have a HDMI port on device with high refresh rate. I have a decent dock that can give me 4k/60hz HDMI but not 120hz refresh for macs (it works on windows). It's a minor thing but having 120hz is nice when I'm docked at home. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | lo_fye an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I've been using the free version of TailScale to use macOS's built-in screen sharing app to use my home Mac mini from my work MacBook Pro. Works great! That combined with ChatGPT/Codex's "remote" feature is an amazing combination. I think you'd be totally fine with a Mac Studio + Neo. |
| |
| ▲ | samsolomon 43 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I have been considering this. I bought a Macbook Air in the interm waiting to see what the Macbook Ultra looks like, but honestly—it's the best form factor ever. I love it! Even though it's only like a pound heavier, the Pro feels like a monster. Thinking about getting a Mini or Studio with more horsepower to stay at home. Any other apps or suggestions? I'm still not exactly sure what working this way looks like. |
|
|
| ▲ | matt-p 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Another option is a 'maxed out' mini e.g M5 Pro/64GB. Mini is super easy to travel with if you know there'll be a 'dock' at the far end e.g office<>home or whatever. |
| |
| ▲ | msdz 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | So I can somewhat speak to this, as I actually did this for a while c. 2021 and 2022. The issue (apart from my Mac mini still having the old, bigger form factor back then) is that this requires a full shutdown (obviously), and that is more friction than opening a closed laptop lid. It just takes a moment for every app and background service etc. to settle back in after, and depending on how your brain works, you might not like that a whole lot. It absolutely is a cool feeling to carry a pretty mighty desktop in the backpack, though. | | |
| ▲ | matt-p 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I think it's actually good to have a forced reboot from time to time, but then I'm not very disciplined in closing stuff I'm no-longer using! Especially like docker containers I was using months ago, that I forgot to shutdown. | | |
| ▲ | msdz 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yeah, I agree (with the same unfortunate habit) – but up to twice a day of forced work full stop is overdoing it, too. |
| |
| ▲ | anentropic 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I did this for a few years, going further back in time. The shutdown thing didn't bother me, and in fact the Mini was lighter than a Macbook Air at the time. So all in all it was pretty convenient. | |
| ▲ | mettamage 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | What if you have some battery system working? Then technically, you could travel with it | | |
| ▲ | boromisp 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | At that point you lose too much convenience. Maybe if someone built a mini UPS with at least 10000Ah capacity, USB-C 4 pass-through and the right form factor to permanently attach it on top of the mini. | | | |
| ▲ | msdz 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | And imagine plugging a small iPad screen into the thing with sidecar… Almost like a Macbook! |
|
| |
| ▲ | seviu 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | A part of my brain can’t process acquiring a Mac Mini M5 Pro knowing that they sell M6 despite being aware that it is just a weaker processor. It will get worse with the MacBook ultra rocking a M5 too. Apple’s marketing department is gonna kill me. | | |
| ▲ | kridsdale1 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Think about it maybe like: I want a 2026 pickup truck.
The dealer also sells a
2027 hatchback. I am not shopping for a hatchback. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | hectdev 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I dusted of my lightest computer with an M1 chip and use Tailscale to make my network virtual from anywhere. Been running a. Pi5 as a main house hub and an M1 Pro as an always on Mac. It would be nice to go all out and make a Studio a hub I can just screen share into for major compute. |
|
| ▲ | appplication 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I had the same thought, I grabbed a studio two years ago for this reason and it’s been great. 99% of the time lack of portability isn’t a concern. Every now and then (e.g. travel) I notice the limitation, but it’s not much of an inconvenience to just not do some work for a bit. |
| |
| ▲ | Gareth321 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Plus remote work is getting easier and easier. There are so few instances when I'm not able to get online. If we lived in a world where hardware were getting cheaper, it might make sense to splurge. In this environment I think the Neo is perfect. | | |
| ▲ | dannyw 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Build quality of the Neo is extremely good, I love the keyboard — it’s more tactile and reminds me of early 2010s MacBooks. I’ll be selling my M4 MBA soon, I genuinely use the Neo more. Huge difference in typing experience. Great repairability is a plus. It was super easy, and actually fun to open. Felt like unboxing an Apple product. Applied the thermal paste mod for $10 which works excellently; I’ve had it shortly after launch. And I love the notchless display, even if I wished the color gamut was a bit better. | | |
|
|
|
| ▲ | pixelready an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I got an M1 Max studio w/ 64gb when they first came out and I love it. Price was obviously a lot more reasonable at the time. I’m fortunate to have dedicated office space, and there is definitely a nice psychological effect to having a desktop in a specific spot and “going to the office”.
I’ve since purchased an m3 MacBook Air as my thin client and for lightweight travel use, and when my wife needs to take a call in the office or whatever I pop out to the living room and either hop on Remote Desktop or SSH into my Studio. Highly recommend this setup. If you’re primarily doing thin client on a local network, a neo should be fine for that (and to use as a media player/communicator around the house).
That said, I have been eyeballing Omarchy… |
|
| ▲ | transitorykris an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I've been running a desktop Mac in addition to MacBook and iPad for the past decade (currently a first gen Studio still holding quite strong). It's primarily a focus thing, secondarily it's a way to keep work happening locally while I'm elsewhere, and never have the frustrations of docking and screen geometries all re-arranging, etc. The iPad is at the opposite extreme, it's for recreation, burn out management. The MacBook exists for when I actually need to do "real work" outside of the house. |
|
| ▲ | Aurornis 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I’ve debated Mac Studio or MBP at each generation. For equal spec machines the price premium to get a MBP over the Studio is always smaller than I expected, so I pay the extra amount and get the MBP. This changes when you get into connotations that aren’t available in the laptop form factor, but with RAM prices the way they are those configurations are more than I want to spend on a local machine right now. For running local LLMs the high memory Mac options always look appealing, but the processing speed (prefill) is so much slower than GPUs that it hurts. For situations where you have no rush and can let something work in the background for 24 hours it can some times be ignored, but the speeds I get from a real GPU setup are so much faster that I never use the larger models on a high memory Mac any more. |
|
| ▲ | jermaustin1 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I've been holding out, because I think my next purchase will be a Studio with an Ultra Chip in it. I'm wanting it to be a "forever" server, so I'm holding out while I can. |
| |
| ▲ | JohnBooty 32 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | If running LLMs locally matters, it’s hard to imagine a “forever machine” existing in anything less than 5-10 years, probably more. This stuff is just evolving so rapidly. Buying a “forever machine” today might be like buying a “forever GPU” in 2003. | |
| ▲ | Gareth321 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Supply rumours are next year we see an M7 AI-focused chip with large inference performance upgrades. It's unlikely we'll see heavy upgrades in other areas. If you care about AI, it's worth waiting. If you don't, pull the trigger now. RAM constraints are likely to get worse next year. Or wait 2-3 years and prices should be back to Earth (plus newer and even better chips). I'm waiting this out. | | |
| ▲ | ahknight 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yeah, but how many years until 128GB+ is attainable by mere mortals again? My 2021 home server build was 64GB of RAM. My 2025 build was 32GB and zram. :/ | | |
| ▲ | xhkkffbf 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | My desktop with 64gb of RAM has been my best performing financial asset. The value keeps rising. |
|
| |
| ▲ | jubilanti 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Then you'll always be waiting, there's always something new the industry tries to tempt you with. | | |
| ▲ | jermaustin1 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | I just wait for a cycle or two where the leaps and bounds are more like hops and steps. So if the M7 Ultra improves inference by 2x over the M5, but the M9 Ultra only improves by 1.2x over the M7, that's my signal to buy. Unfortunately they haven't slowed down yet. |
| |
| ▲ | simonh 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Buy in 2 years, or buy now and have it last 2 years less than forever. |
|
|
| ▲ | jasode 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| >I do wonder if my next computer should be a Mac Studio instead of a MBP that lives its life docked. Having owned 3 MacBook Pros since 2008, the decision to make my next computer be a Mac Studio came down to (1) MacBook thermal throttling that slows down CPUs when it starts to overheat and (2) easier upgrade of Mac Studio SSD with after-market storage module whereas the MacBook requires more complicated disassembly and hot air gun to dislodge the surface mounted SSDs. I have a brand new M5 Pro MacBook Pro I don't like it when the fans turn on. The Mac Studio will be faster and quieter for the same workloads. |
| |
| ▲ | 4fterd4rk 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | You don't want a computer that does thermal throttling but also do not like it when the fans turn on? | | |
| ▲ | jasode 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | >but also do not like it when the fans turn on? Sorry for not being clearer. I don't like the MacBook's noise when the fans turn on. The Mac Studio has bigger heat sinks to delay the need for thermal management -- and if its fan does need to turn on, the bigger size means it's still silent instead of the high-pitched whooshing noise the tiny fans make in the MacBook. | | |
| ▲ | jmalicki 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | You can get large under-laptop cooling pads with giant fans that can help this somewhat. It's not part of the laptop, but help if it's docked at home. It's not totally ideal since the bottom of your laptop doesn't have radiator fins, but does help. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | duxup an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I’ve wanted the idea of a home server or even home “mainframe” and some terminals for me and family forever but the idea never takes off…. |
| |
|
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | herpdyderp 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This is my setup (except I have an Air because the Neo didn't exist yet). And it's great. Tailscale makes it trivial. |
| |
| ▲ | b15h0p 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | So, do you use VNC (or ssh) to access the Mac Studio at home? Or do you only access other stuff that's living in your home network? | | |
|
|
| ▲ | saidinesh5 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| At my current job, one of my biggest blunders was thinking "Let me just order the same hardware as most of my teammates to avoid unnecessary complications". Most, if not all, of our current work happens on remote cloud vms. Now I'm stuck with carrying a 3KG monstrosity to work.Every day. Absolutely no positives compared to my ThinkPad that weighed less than half in my previous job. Remote development is "good enough" these days. With VS Code, Development containers etc... Having a light weight, portable laptop is so much nicer than a laptop that you can't even rest on your lap for long duration. The only thing you need to be mindful of using light weight laptops is not having enough RAM to fit all your browser tabs.. |
| |
| ▲ | digitaltrees 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I totally agree I use containers through propelcode.app which means I can code on any device including my phone and the environment is the same as the server target. It’s even more important with agents that can delete files and change OS settings. I never need to worry that a coding session ends up breaking my main OS environment by deleting or changing a file. | |
| ▲ | wombat-man 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yeah I stepped down to a smaller MBP. the only reason I didn't go for an air is my home setup with dual monitors involves using the HDMI port. There probably is a dock or something out there though. |
|
|
| ▲ | vidarh 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I used to have a high-powered laptop, but just use a combination of ssh and NFS to my machine at home from a low powered laptop for travel these days. It works well. Makes managing both backups and handling failure scenarios involving loss or unauthorised access to the laptop less of a hassle as well. |
|
| ▲ | bdhdhduuyd 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I have been thinking a lot about buying a very fast desktop and a cheap laptop that uses remote desktop to connect to the fast computer. But in the end I ended op buying a Lenovo Legion and put Linux on it. Laptops are so fast these days that I didn't want to be bothered with setting up connectivity to a remote desktop. But if your laptop never leaves your desk I think a desktop computer is a great option. Relatively cheaper and easier to maintain and upgrade. |
|
| ▲ | bearjaws 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Recently took a Minisforum 7840hs PC out of rotation as a media PC and made it a full time coding workstation with Proxmox. I do a VM per project due to the nature of agentic editors. I was using a VM setup on my MBP but it felt like a huge waste, having to leave a laptop on 24/7 when all it did was run Claude Code inside VMs. I likely will stick with a Macbook Air 15" for next purchase, and beef up my "Claude Server" down the road. |
|
| ▲ | sanderjd 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yep, this is my exact thought. The pendulum has swung back toward a desktop making more sense for me than a laptop. It all depends on whether there is anything useful to do with an amount of computation that can't be fit into a laptop package. For a long time there wasn't, now there is. |
|
| ▲ | jgwil2 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If all you want to do is remote into your desktop, Neo seems like overkill. Why not just get a $200 Chromebook and save yourself $500? |
| |
| ▲ | ahknight 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Because who hates themselves that much? It's the thing I touch and interact with. That's exactly the part that needs to be sturdy, smooth, and pretty. It's the facade to the beast at the other end. | |
| ▲ | rjrjrjrj 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Because the screen, keyboard, and especially trackpad on a $200 Chromebook sucks? | | |
| ▲ | frollogaston 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Also it'll be truly too slow. You need to at least be able to access a shared document while a video call is going. The funniest recurring thing when working at Google was new hires getting baited into taking a Chromebook, then not being able to switch to a Mac for like 2 years. Our team made sure new people didn't fall for that. | |
| ▲ | bredren 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Also: the enclosure, and the hinges. |
| |
| ▲ | PennRobotics 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | This comment got me curious, so I searched for cheap laptops with mobile internet. There's at least one LTE Chromebook now for about 300 euros. This might be my next laptop if it can run Tailscale and remote desktop. |
|
|
| ▲ | master_crab 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I had the same view recently. For the past year I’ve been using my iPad to remote into both my MacBook Pro M1 Max and my racked Linux workstation at home using Jump and moonlight/sunshine, respectively. Never looked back |
|
| ▲ | armadyl 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That’s nearly what I do but on a smaller scale. My iPad Pro serves as my laptop 90% of the time, and the 10% of the time I need to actually code and test in a chromium browser I remote into a mini. |
|
| ▲ | nullfern 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Cheap Linux laptop with Tailscale back into the Studio when traveling? |
| |
| ▲ | frollogaston 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | No iTerm2, weird shortcuts, random issues in video calls?, also not really cheap to get a laptop that reliably works with Linux and has decent battery life |
|
|
| ▲ | ape4 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| How about business where you send in all your old devices and get back a SSD using using their memories |
|
| ▲ | contingencies an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Happy with M4 Mini, although I recommend using a well ventilated M.2 enclosure instead of the integrated docks as I just had a 2TB Kingston die which I'm pretty sure was caused by "zero thermal forks given (chopsticks only)" UGreen hub design. Also can use as a laptop and replace screen/keyboard/whatever when failed/unsuitable. Higher resulting device longevity, especially with Asahi Linux making such great progress. https://github.com/vk2diy/hackbook-m4-mini |
|
| ▲ | spockz 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yes, except that the only way to get a fancy screen is also to put the fancy cpu in it. If there would be an Air with the screen of the pro I would buy it. Maybe even a Neo with that screen. |
|
| ▲ | zer00eyz 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Im writing this from a MacBook Air. Everything is a container or VM now, and none of it runs locally for me. I have a desktop (older intel) with giant monitors and a keyboard for when I sit at the desk. I have the laptop for when I travel, go out or just want to work from the couch. When I do my next upgrade to "better hardware" I'm not migrating a machine, rather I'm migrating the containers. My workflow is such that if I loose one of the boxes I sit at to a cup of coffee I really wont care other than the financial loss of a new laptop or keyboard. The biggest win in all this was dumping the off the shelf firewall/router and moving to Opnsense. Wireguard vpn lets me route all my traffic through home for all my devices (and what is now a growing home lab). There are scopes of work that this setup would not work for. I would not want to be a video editor with this set up, it's not ideal if you want to play AAA games. But for what I do, it is pretty ideal. |
|
| ▲ | kylehotchkiss 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Oh yeah. Throw it behind tailscale. Herdr multiplexer in terminal is cool, it’ll remember your session if you open it in ssh from the neo |
|
| ▲ | znpy 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I’m doing essentially this, and got a MacBook Neo. Fir kinda the first time in my life I don’t really have development tools on my personal laptop. I ghostty and openvpn client installed. I have a large remote linux workstation (2x 8c/16t xeon cpus, 256gb ram, 2x8tb spinning rust disk) and i have my tools over there (along with some VMs). It works surprisingly well. Also, the macbook neo is a surprisingly capable little machine. |
|
| ▲ | epolanski 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| For a desktop you may find yourself better on a Linux or Windows machine price/performance wise. I personally own an M3 ultra, an M1 max as laptops, but my desktop is a Ryzen desktop I built in 2022 and it was a third in price of the ultra for more power. |
|
| ▲ | hirvi74 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Do it! I went with the Mini/Neo combo. I don't need MBP power when out and about. When at home, the Mini is all I use. |
|
| ▲ | super_mario 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I was in the same situation, I used maxed out 15'' M3 Max MacBook Pro docked to Studio Display closed on vertical stand behind the screen. It was fine for office work, but running local LLMs would definitely overheat it. The battery started degrading purely due to heat issues. And it was audible as well. I decided to get Mac Studio M4 Max, also all maxed out config and the cooling is so much better that I can run local LLMs like Gemma 3/4, gpt-oss 120b all day long without any heat issues or any audible fan noise. So for my use case it was the right decision. I subsequently added 15'' M5 Max MacBook Pro all maxed out to my collection and even though it is slightly faster on LLM inference (I get 100 tokens/s with Gemma 4 27b model), you just can't run LLMs longer than a few minutes. It starts overheating and gets really loud. |
| |
| ▲ | seanmcdirmid 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Weird, I’ve run LLM batch sessions for hours on my Max M3 MBP. It doesn’t get very loud, though I’m not getting anything close to 100 tok/s on a 27b model, I use a 35b MoE model just to get 90 tok/s. The fan comes on but thermally it never overheats. I do have it in a vertical closed position, though. |
|
|
| ▲ | tamimio 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That’s what I have been doing for years, it remains in the house secured while I ssh into it from an old thinkpad. You can get air to pair it with it if you really wanna have that seamless flow, otherwise, ssh works well. |
|
| ▲ | code-blooded 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| <deleted> |
| |
| ▲ | SubiculumCode 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I can't wait for an actual competitor to the M chips from apple. It's frustrating. | |
| ▲ | ogrisel 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | What CPU / GPU combination would you recommend? Can use unified host+device memory? | |
| ▲ | swozey 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I'd never go x86 again after owning an m1. I'd have replaced an x86 laptop 2 or 3 times by now (2020 m1). My last $3500 dell xps 13z before buying the m1 was absolutely horrible. |
|
|
| ▲ | pjmlp 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Apple prices have always been insane, there is a reason why during the days it almost went bankrupt, in Europe it could not rival with PC, Amiga, Atari, Acorn. |
|
| ▲ | try-working 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Laptops can't do agentic engineering. They get hot as hell and battery drains instantly. I think this will promote a switch to desktops for the next couple of years, until we have new mobile chips. |
| |
| ▲ | steve1977 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | But laptops can remote into boxes that can run agents. So a combination of a powerful desktop and a "cheap" laptop might indeed be attractive. | |
| ▲ | jonathanberger 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Are you referring specifically to agentic engineering with locally hosted models? |
|