| ▲ | simonw 2 days ago |
| Anthropic's guide for job applicants on how you should use Claude when applying for a job there is relevant here: https://www.anthropic.com/candidate-ai-guidance |
|
| ▲ | names_are_hard 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| I find the language of "collaborating with Claude" off-putting. I don't collaborate with Claude, I use Claude. It's a tool in my hands, not a colleague or a friend. |
| |
| ▲ | michaelt 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | AI companies seem eager to perpetuate the fantasy that all users carefully review all LLM output, and supervise all tool calls. Anthropic certainly isn't planning to take responsibility for Claude's mistakes - that's the user's responsibility. Describing everything as 'collaborating' is I think part of their efforts to emphasise the user's role in the process. | | |
| ▲ | einszwei 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I think the opposite. AI Companies use the term collaborate to increase the trust in the LLM output. I trust the output of colleagues I am collaborating with and have an assumption of some shared responsibility. But if I use a tool like numpy/matplotlib then I am accountable for the conclusions I come up with. I can't make an excuse that "matplotlib" created a plot so my decisions were incorrect and not due to my own negligence. | |
| ▲ | cyanydeez 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | If that were true, they'd cut their token gen speed and reduce all prices to th level their users could actually read what it produces. |
| |
| ▲ | DuperPower a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | dont you collaborate with your toaster to make breakfast | |
| ▲ | nisegami a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | I have the opposite view point, "collaborating with Claude" is I think how I would best describe that experience. | | |
| ▲ | stuaxo 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Not collaborating with Claude but searching and using all the data stolen by it. | |
| ▲ | butlike a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | Do you collaborate with your keyboard on the spreadsheet? The prosaic prompting is an I/O device to a machine. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | JSR_FDED 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I’ve read the link, but I don’t get how it’s relevant to the OP’s point that Anthropic public communications don’t sound like Claude. Can you enlighten me? |
| |
| ▲ | simonw 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Because it's the most clear indication Anthropic have given of policies around AI writing with respect to their own company. Things like: > Not allowed:
Prompt: "Write my answers to the application questions for an AI safety researcher position at Anthropic." Result: Generic content with experiences you haven't actually had I haven't seen other policy documents from them that are as relevant to the question anywhere else. | |
| ▲ | gjvc 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | why do you care? | | |
| ▲ | JSR_FDED 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Because Simon usually posts interesting comments. Do I need a different reason? |
|
|
