Remix.run Logo
paulpauper 17 hours ago

a bullet is faster than any car. the point is, it's a humanoid type robot, not just a faster vehicle.

qayxc 17 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I don't see the difference. Is a humanoid robot not a machine? What surprises is that it took so long to achieve this. It took Honda 20 years to get to ASIMO in 2000. I'm not surprised by the fact that 26(!) years later, a humanoid robot finally exceeds human capabilities in basic tasks like running.

Such robot would easily smash the current marathon record as well and the only thing I'd be impressed by, would be the battery capacity tbh.

Cookingboy 17 hours ago | parent | next [-]

But not all machines are the same?

If you were ever trapped on the top floor of a burning building, should we just send a car up there?

Nobody is surprised by advancement like this, but there is still a lot of engineering that went into it, not talking about how it’s now almost consumer grade tech that you can buy.

qayxc 16 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> If you were ever trapped on the top floor of a burning building, should we just send a car up there?

Riddle me this then: what role does a robot that has been built to run real fast play in that scenario?

Sure, a good deal of engineering went into this, but the hard part - solving bipedal locomotion - had been done long before that. Apart from showing off it's not really advancing the field and so there's not too much left to be impressed by (honestly, the battery and actuator efficiency that allowed the thing to do a half marathon was MUCH more impressive, at least to me). It seems to me to be more analogous to car tuning.

throw1234567891 14 hours ago | parent [-]

> what role does a robot that has been built to run real fast play in that scenario?

It will run real fast up the stairs, I guess? Is it a good enough riddle?

qayxc 4 hours ago | parent [-]

The thing has no real arms, hands or carry capacity, so what would be the point?

Running up the stairs is the easy part after all. The difficult part in such scenario is lack of orientation due to smoke, obstacles like locked doors or fallen debris, unstable walls and ceilings, locating people and getting them out safely. All of those things require a good amount of autonomy, on-the-spot physical problem solving and judgement.

To this effect, the recent DARPA Triage Challenge, which has its final taking place in November this year, seems like a much more thorough and practical demonstration of current capabilities. Something to look forward to if you're interested in the current state-of-the-art w.r.t. real-world applications of robotics.

throw1234567891 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If I'm trapped in a burning building and am at the top floor, send a helicopter, dude. The robot will be fine on the way back (maybe) bu I won't!

paulpauper 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

What people find impressive or interesting is subjective, I guess.

qayxc 16 hours ago | parent [-]

Absolutely. I was impressed by ASIMO and Atlas. Running fast, though, doesn't seem all that impressive by comparison, but yeah YMMV.

hakfoo 7 hours ago | parent [-]

It's a very pretty benchmark.

Everyone has the same basic objective and measurement norm, so we can see how performance improves year over year, and how different manufacturers handle a specific known goal, even if it's not super-representative of real world use cases.

Billion-dollar supercomputers don't spend most of their time running LINPACK, and some probably perform better on specific tasks, but it doesn't make the Top 500 list any less of a thing.

shevy-java 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Why would you call it "humanoid"? Can you qualify this? Because I came to the conclusion that this is NOT a humanoid robot. Having one rectangle and four long spear-like things, does not make something "humanoid". So which criteria do you use?

phoghed 17 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Per the article

> Lightning the humanoid robot clocks 9.32sec in Beijing

Bipedal, hips, knees, feet. Looks humanoid to me.

If cloudflare puts this in a grid of images and asks me to pick the humanoids, I’m clicking it

paulpauper 17 hours ago | parent [-]

yea people will look for any reason to disagree. It's right in the article.

petcat 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think of "humanoid" as a machine capable of operating in the same complex physical environment as humans do. For instance, it is generally more comfortable for a healthy adult human to use a steep staircase than a steep ramp. So a "humanoid" robot would be capable of using the same staircase instead of requiring a ramp to be purpose-built just for it.

17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
nom 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

it is of humanoid shape