| ▲ | shevy-java 17 hours ago | |||||||
Why would you call it "humanoid"? Can you qualify this? Because I came to the conclusion that this is NOT a humanoid robot. Having one rectangle and four long spear-like things, does not make something "humanoid". So which criteria do you use? | ||||||||
| ▲ | phoghed 17 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Per the article > Lightning the humanoid robot clocks 9.32sec in Beijing Bipedal, hips, knees, feet. Looks humanoid to me. If cloudflare puts this in a grid of images and asks me to pick the humanoids, I’m clicking it | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | petcat 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I think of "humanoid" as a machine capable of operating in the same complex physical environment as humans do. For instance, it is generally more comfortable for a healthy adult human to use a steep staircase than a steep ramp. So a "humanoid" robot would be capable of using the same staircase instead of requiring a ramp to be purpose-built just for it. | ||||||||
| ▲ | 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
| [deleted] | ||||||||
| ▲ | nom 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
it is of humanoid shape | ||||||||