Strong dislike for papers that tell me what to do in the title, especially when even the paper admits a loose correlation of the intermediate tokens compared to solution correctness. My solutions work and they speak for themselves.

▲

aaraujo002 an hour ago | parent | next [-]

This is a position paper. Its purpose is to advocate for a specific viewpoint to the ML community.

From [1]: "Position papers make an argument for a viewpoint or perspective about what should be done [...]"

[1] https://icml.cc/Conferences/2026/CallForPositionPapers

	▲	hellohello2 21 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Sure, and the parent comment's position is that they dislike it. Its purpose is to advocate against clickbait titles becoming normalized in the scientific community.

▲

bryan0 6 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I hate articles that do this as well in the title. It's basically just a form of clickbait.

▲

dgellow an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

A paper title is marketing, you’re expected to read its content

▲

newswasboring an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

> My solutions work and they speak for themselves.

I understand the sentiment, and I also use the "thinking" traces as insight, but wouldn't you want your solutions to be based upon a good understanding? If the correlation is weak, then our solution is also weak.