| ▲ | Pxtl 5 hours ago | |
> We regulate gambling because it's a specific thing Except when it's called "prediction markets" and therefore it isn't. | ||
| ▲ | m4ck_ 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Those are relatively new and the president's children have financial interests in them, so they won't see any regulation any time soon. But it's certainly possible they will be regulated in the future... if we ever have a less-openly-corrupt government again. | ||
| ▲ | mslt 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
It’s such a joke. But we also need to find ways to study and measure non-gambling digital platform addiction like 15 years ago. Thanks to algorithmic consumption, we’re nearing a whole generation of adults that have no idea how to navigate their societal agency and 3 trailing generations that had once learned and since forgot. | ||
| ▲ | ggm 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
If we set the barrier to entry in prediction markets to an equivalent of an age/height check on entry, it would be well north of "yes, I am a mom-and-pop first time investor, I have never been here before, I know nothing except what some spammer told me and claude" Somehow the "you can afford to lose your entire stake, you aren't leveraged, this isn't a con you fell into" is missing. (thats aside from "you aren't an inside trader with privileged knowledge because of family ties to the WH, are you") | ||